BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20860291)

  • 1. First rule to improving clinical outcomes--understand how you are measured.
    Oliva AF
    Physician Exec; 2010; 36(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 20860291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnet facility credits communication for success.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2008 Mar; 15(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 18447248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional benchmarks show how you stack up.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 2000 Apr; 7(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 11009762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is a type I and how do you clear one?
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11246635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top compliance issues for first half of 2003.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Nov; 23(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 14635406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indexing performance measures.
    Fibuch E; Ahmed A
    Physician Exec; 2013; 39(6):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 24354142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leveraging performance measurement and management: the quality and efficiency edge.
    Cerese J
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 Nov; 22(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 11761795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EP scoring category changes for disease-specific care.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Aug; 26(8):7-8. PubMed ID: 16937840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New survey expands interview pool.
    LaPorte M
    Provider; 2008 Dec; 34(12):26-8, 31-6. PubMed ID: 19202703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Upcoming changes to standards.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):5, 9. PubMed ID: 16933546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance measures depend on effective use of good data.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Jan; 26(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15819164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking project spurs better guideline adherence.
    Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Feb; 9(2):20-1, 13. PubMed ID: 15816311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scorecard for sterile processing metrics.
    OR Manager; 2008 Jul; 24(7):15-6. PubMed ID: 18700491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The new JCAHO accreditation report.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):21, 26-7. PubMed ID: 14746098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viewpoint: report cards are here to stay.
    Beyers M
    Patient Care Manag; 2003 Jan; 19(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 12593142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing the health care scorecard.
    Shutt JA
    Manag Care; 2003 Sep; 12(9):42-6. PubMed ID: 14528673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. JCAHO update. ORYX moves full speed ahead.
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Apr; 16(8):10-2. PubMed ID: 10977709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing clinical resources and outcomes to understand best practices.
    Cudney AE; Cox J; Baugh K
    J Healthc Manag; 2002; 47(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 12325250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Don't fret if you can't find your benchmarking mate.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 4(8):109-10. PubMed ID: 10169269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.