These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20861765)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; Pezzato A; Barbiani C; Mantovani W; Caliari G; Alfonsi U; Tavella D; Mucelli RP
    Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1203-16. PubMed ID: 21892715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography demonstrate high correlation for area stenosis quantification in noncalcified and mixed plaques.
    Krupiński M; Miszalski-Jamka T; Guzik B; Andres M; Zmudka K; Mazur W; Pelberg R; Banyś R; Urbańczyk M; Kostkiewicz M
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 23154001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
    Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial.
    Vavere AL; Arbab-Zadeh A; Rochitte CE; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Gottlieb I; Clouse ME; Bush DE; Hoe JW; de Roos A; Cox C; Lima JA; Miller JM
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 21828192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
    Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative coronary arterial stenosis assessment by multidetector CT and invasive coronary angiography for identifying patients with myocardial perfusion abnormalities.
    Godoy GK; Vavere A; Miller JM; Chahal H; Niinuma H; Lemos P; Hoe J; Paul N; Clouse ME; Ramos CD; Lima JA; Arbab-Zadeh A
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):922-30. PubMed ID: 22814771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving beyond binary grading of coronary arterial stenoses on coronary computed tomographic angiography: insights for the imager and referring clinician.
    Cheng V; Gutstein A; Wolak A; Suzuki Y; Dey D; Gransar H; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Berman DS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul; 1(4):460-71. PubMed ID: 19356468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
    Sen T; Kilit C; Astarcioglu MA; Asarcikli LD; Aksu T; Kafes H; Parspur A; Gozubuyuk G; Amasyali B
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of nonculprit coronary lesions: comparison of cardiac 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography.
    Dodd JD; Rieber J; Pomerantsev E; Chaithiraphan V; Achenbach S; Moreiras JM; Abbara S; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ; Cury RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):432-8. PubMed ID: 18647913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients.
    Kefer J; Coche E; Legros G; Pasquet A; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15992641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from single-source dual-energy CT on coronary stenosis quantification.
    Stehli J; Clerc OF; Fuchs TA; Possner M; Gräni C; Benz DC; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 26754621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Wang J; Lu Y; Zhang ZL; Jiang SS; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):727-40. PubMed ID: 20707657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography.
    Busch S; Johnson TR; Nikolaou K; von Ziegler F; Knez A; Reiser MF; Becker CR
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17180326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT.
    Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Schepis T; Scheffel H; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(980):649-53. PubMed ID: 19221184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography.
    Cury RC; Pomerantsev EV; Ferencik M; Hoffmann U; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 96(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 16169361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in a population unselected for degree of coronary artery calcification and without heart rate modification.
    Lin CJ; Hsu JC; Lai YJ; Wang KL; Lee JY; Li AH; Chu SH
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 20103432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.
    Cury RC; Ferencik M; Achenbach S; Pomerantsev E; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.