These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20862251)

  • 1. Theoretical formulation of principal components analysis to detect and correct for population stratification.
    Ma J; Amos CI
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20862251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principal components analysis of population admixture.
    Ma J; Amos CI
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40115. PubMed ID: 22808102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On rare variants in principal component analysis of population stratification.
    Ma S; Shi G
    BMC Genet; 2020 Mar; 21(1):34. PubMed ID: 32183706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FastPop: a rapid principal component derived method to infer intercontinental ancestry using genetic data.
    Li Y; Byun J; Cai G; Xiao X; Han Y; Cornelis O; Dinulos JE; Dennis J; Easton D; Gorlov I; Seldin MF; Amos CI
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():122. PubMed ID: 26961892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of methods for adjusting population stratification in genome-wide association studies: Standard versus categorical principal component analysis.
    Turkmen AS; Yuan Y; Billor N
    Ann Hum Genet; 2019 Nov; 83(6):454-464. PubMed ID: 31322288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.
    Conomos MP; Miller MB; Thornton TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):276-93. PubMed ID: 25810074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of population-based association study methods correcting for population stratification.
    Zhang F; Wang Y; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3392. PubMed ID: 18852890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A genealogical interpretation of principal components analysis.
    McVean G
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Oct; 5(10):e1000686. PubMed ID: 19834557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative?
    Mezey JG; Houle D
    Genetics; 2003 Sep; 165(1):411-25. PubMed ID: 14504246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GRAF-pop: A Fast Distance-Based Method To Infer Subject Ancestry from Multiple Genotype Datasets Without Principal Components Analysis.
    Jin Y; Schaffer AA; Feolo M; Holmes JB; Kattman BL
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2447-2461. PubMed ID: 31151998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel and fast approach for population structure inference using kernel-PCA and optimization.
    Popescu AA; Harper AL; Trick M; Bancroft I; Huber KT
    Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1421-31. PubMed ID: 25326237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PC-DOT: Improving genomic prediction ability of principal component regression by DOT product.
    Sun H; Wei M; Xu Z; Bai C; Sun B
    Anim Genet; 2022 Dec; 53(6):888-891. PubMed ID: 36168679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geographic sampling scheme as a determinant of the major axis of genetic variation in principal components analysis.
    DeGiorgio M; Rosenberg NA
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 23051843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of a standardized system to perform population structure analyses with limited sample size or with different sets of SNP genotypes.
    Kumasaka N; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Takahashi A; Kubo M; Nakamura Y; Kamatani N
    J Hum Genet; 2010 Aug; 55(8):525-33. PubMed ID: 20555335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal selection of genetic variants for adjustment of population stratification in European association studies.
    Brinster R; Scherer D; Lorenzo Bermejo J
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):753-761. PubMed ID: 30863848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling for human population stratification in rare variant association studies.
    Bouaziz M; Mullaert J; Bigio B; Seeleuthner Y; Casanova JL; Alcais A; Abel L; Cobat A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19015. PubMed ID: 34561511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for population stratification in practice: a comparison of the main strategies dedicated to genome-wide association studies.
    Bouaziz M; Ambroise C; Guedj M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28845. PubMed ID: 22216125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of population stratification by correlation-selected principal components.
    Lee S; Wright FA; Zou F
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):967-74. PubMed ID: 21133882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting Genomic Signatures of Natural Selection with Principal Component Analysis: Application to the 1000 Genomes Data.
    Duforet-Frebourg N; Luu K; Laval G; Bazin E; Blum MG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Apr; 33(4):1082-93. PubMed ID: 26715629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.