71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20862535)
1. Contact, moral foundations or knowledge? What predicts attitudes towards women who undergo IVF.
Malina A; Roczniewska M; Pooley JA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):346. PubMed ID: 33933010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the use of IVF add-on treatments driven by patients or clinics? Findings from a UK patient survey.
Cirkovic S; Wilkinson J; Lensen S; Jackson E; Harper J; Lindemann K; Costa-Font J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 37063051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient interest in and clinician reservations on polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.
Barlevy D; Cenolli I; Campbell T; Furrer R; Mukherjee M; Kostick-Quenet K; Carmi S; Lencz T; Lázaro-Muñoz G; Pereira S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 May; 41(5):1221-1231. PubMed ID: 38470550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptance of Elective Single-embryo Transfer in a Resource-limited Setting: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Study.
Jayakumar NP; Solanki M; Karuppusami R; Joseph T; Kunjummen AT; Kamath MS
J Hum Reprod Sci; 2023; 16(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 38045498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS).
Rai V; Betsworth A; Beer C; Ndukwe G; Glazebrook C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2011 Jan; 28(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is guided, targeted information about the risks of twin pregnancy able to increase the acceptance of single embryo transfer among IVF couples? A prospective study.
Masciovecchio M; Scarafia C; Razzano A; Canosa S; Gennarelli G; Carosso AR; Benedetto C; Revelli A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jul; 37(7):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 32440931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.
Leese B; Denton J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20141337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risks of spontaneously and IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistical premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
Gleicher N; Kushnir VA; Barad DH
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 May; 14(1):25. PubMed ID: 27142226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference.
Fiddelers AA; Nieman FH; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Evers JL; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2092-100. PubMed ID: 21546387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.
Maheshwari A; Griffiths S; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 20634207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes towards gamete donation among IVF doctors in the Nordic countries-are they in line with national legislation?
Lampic C; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2009 May; 26(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 19472047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
