These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2086255)

  • 1. The interaction between reaction forces and stabilization systems during intrusion of the anterior teeth and its effect on the posterior unit.
    Van den Bulcke MM; Dermaut LR
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 12(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 2086255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The center of resistance of anterior teeth during intrusion using the laser reflection technique and holographic interferometry.
    Vanden Bulcke MM; Dermaut LR; Sachdeva RC; Burstone CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Sep; 90(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 3463197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of intrusive mechanics of the type "segmented arch" on a macerated human skull using the laser reflection technique and holographic interferometry.
    Dermaut LR; Vanden Bulcke MM
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 3456718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A holographic study of variations in bone deformations resulting from different headgear forces in a macerated human skull.
    Zentner A; Sergl HG; Filippidis G
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):463-72. PubMed ID: 8974183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mechanics of lower incisor intrusion: experiments in nongrowing baboons.
    Woods MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Mar; 93(3):186-95. PubMed ID: 3422774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental determination of the center of resistance of the upper first molar in a macerated, dry human skull submitted to horizontal headgear traction.
    Dermaut LR; Kleutghen JP; De Clerck HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Jul; 90(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3460344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of asymmetric mesio-distal molar positions loaded by a symmetric cervical headgear.
    Kizilova N; Geramy A; Romashov Y
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(4):97-106. PubMed ID: 28133376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of maxillary protraction determined by laser metrology.
    Canut JA; Dalmases F; Gandía JL; Salvador R
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Aug; 12(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 2401342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an orthodontic simulator for measurement of orthodontic forces.
    Kuo B; Takakuda K; Miyairi H
    J Med Dent Sci; 2001 Mar; 48(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12160238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces.
    Maruo IT; Maruo H; Saga AY; de Oliveira DD; Argenta MA; Tanaka OM
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27264500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
    Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forces and moments on posterior teeth generated by incisor intrusion biomechanics.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19840283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An appraisal of growth and reaction to extraoral anchorage. Simulation of orthodontic-orthopedic results.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Feb; 89(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 3456205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
    Çifter M; Saraç M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep overbite correction by intrusion.
    Burstone CR
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Jul; 72(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 267433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The movement of molars with extraoral anchorage (V)].
    Kobayashi K; Kiyomura H
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1984; 13(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 6596992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of time and force magnitude on orthodontic tooth movement.
    Pryputniewicz RJ; Burstone CJ
    J Dent Res; 1979 Aug; 58(8):1754-64. PubMed ID: 288752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.