These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2086259)

  • 1. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 12(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 2086259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years. An implant study.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 7817961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of maxillary position. Implant vs cephalometric methods.
    Verayannont P; Hägg U; Wong RW; McGrath C; Yeung S
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):876-83. PubMed ID: 20578858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT; Sakima CG; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal maxillary and mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in Macaca mulatta. A longitudinal cephalometric study from 2 to 5 years of age.
    Nielsen IL; Bravo LA; Miller AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Nov; 96(5):405-15. PubMed ID: 2816840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 1. A description of osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Ben-Bassat Y; West EE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jan; 91(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 3467578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants.
    Doppel DM; Damon WM; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 8311038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an "anatomical" method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Ben-Bassat Y; West EE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jun; 91(6):463-74. PubMed ID: 3473926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary sagittal and vertical displacement induced by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
    Chung CH; Woo A; Zagarinsky J; Vanarsdall RL; Fonseca RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 11500655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study.
    Kajii TS; Sakaguchi Y; Sawa Y; Tamaoki S
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 30637515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth.
    Solow B; Siersbaek-Nielsen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):449-58. PubMed ID: 1590294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transverse development of the human jaws between the ages of 8.5 and 15.5 years, studied longitudinally with use of implants.
    Korn EL; Baumrind S
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 69(6):1298-306. PubMed ID: 2355125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.
    Tindlund RS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change.
    Nielsen IL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):422-31. PubMed ID: 2718972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural reference structures in the human maxilla: a systematic search in children with tantalum implants.
    Springate S
    J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25808379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Growth and development of the maxillary complex].
    Björk A; Skieller V
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(1):9-52. PubMed ID: 6589211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of alveolar bone grafting in the mixed dentition on maxillary growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Daskalogiannakis J; Ross RB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Sep; 34(5):455-8. PubMed ID: 9345616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.