These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Zinc-containing high copper amalgams: a 3-year clinical evaluation. Osborne JW; Berry TG Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1524742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two independent evaluations of ten amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Leinfelder KF; Gale EN; Sluder TB J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jun; 43(6):622-6. PubMed ID: 6989979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys. Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams. Osborne JW; Gale EN J Dent Res; 1990 Sep; 69(9):1599-601. PubMed ID: 2398187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy. Osborne JW; Berry TG Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials. Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amalgam margin breakdown caused by creep fatigue rupture. Williams PT; Cahoon JR J Dent Res; 1989 Jul; 68(7):1188-93. PubMed ID: 2632604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. Mahler DB; Engle JH J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the marginal leakage of spherical high-copper amalgam. House RC; Patterson MW; Pelleu GB; McCoy RB J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Oct; 44(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 6997472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creep versus marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. Vrijhoef MM; Letzel H J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 3463718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations. Bryant RW; Collins CJ J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]