These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20864094)

  • 1. The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task.
    Krebs RM; Boehler CN; Woldorff MG
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 20864094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reward associations reduce behavioral interference by changing the temporal dynamics of conflict processing.
    Krebs RM; Boehler CN; Appelbaum LG; Woldorff MG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53894. PubMed ID: 23326530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention.
    Krebs RM; Boehler CN; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(26):9752-9. PubMed ID: 21715640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching.
    Kalanthroff E; Henik A
    Psychol Res; 2014 Mar; 78(2):276-88. PubMed ID: 23712333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.
    Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1084-1092. PubMed ID: 32170401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.
    van den Berg B; Krebs RM; Lorist MM; Woldorff MG
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):561-77. PubMed ID: 24820263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks.
    Roberts KL; Hall DA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1063-78. PubMed ID: 18211237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.
    Uttl B; Graf P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 9268815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict modification: predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task.
    Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kunde W
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 29679142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.
    Appelbaum LG; Meyerhoff KL; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2508-21. PubMed ID: 19321654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.