These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20864217)

  • 1. Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation.
    Daeschlein G; Kramer A; Arnold A; Ladwig A; Seabrook GR; Edmiston CE
    Am J Infect Control; 2011 Mar; 39(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20864217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an antimicrobial surgical glove to inactivate live human immunodeficiency virus following simulated glove puncture.
    Edmiston CE; Zhou SS; Hoerner P; Krikorian R; Krepel CJ; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Rossi PJ; Graham MB; Seabrook GR
    Surgery; 2013 Feb; 153(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 23059114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of surgical pass trays to reduce intraoperative glove perforations.
    Eggleston MK; Wax JR; Philput C; Eggleston MH; Weiss MI
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(4):245-7. PubMed ID: 9260125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves.
    Harnoss JC; Partecke LI; Heidecke CD; Hübner NO; Kramer A; Assadian O
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 Mar; 38(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 19822380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].
    Jensen SL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 12645406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [What is the appropriate time-interval for changing gloves during surgical procedures].
    Harnoss JC; Kramer A; Heidecke CD; Assadian O
    Zentralbl Chir; 2010 Feb; 135(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 20108181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
    Murta EF; Silva CS; Júnior OR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 12768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.
    Leitgeb J; Schuster R; Yee BN; Chee PF; Harnoss JC; Starzengruber P; Schäffer M; Assadian O
    BMC Surg; 2015 Jul; 15():81. PubMed ID: 26141495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative contamination of synthetic vascular grafts. Effect of glove change before graft implantation. A prospective randomised study.
    Zdanowski Z; Danielsson G; Jonung T; Norgren L; Ribbe E; Thörne J; Kamme C; Schalén C
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 Mar; 19(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 10753692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].
    Kralj N; Beie M; Hofmann F
    Gesundheitswesen; 1999; 61(8-9):398-403. PubMed ID: 10535220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glove perforation during surgery: what are the risks?
    Green SE; Gompertz RH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Sep; 74(5):306-8. PubMed ID: 1416698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suppression of surgeons' bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures with a new antimicrobial surgical glove.
    Assadian O; Kramer A; Ouriel K; Suchomel M; McLaws ML; Rottman M; Leaper D; Assadian A
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Feb; 15(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 24116857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glove change to reduce the risk of surgical site infection or prosthetic joint infection in arthroplasty surgeries: a systematic review.
    Kim K; Zhu M; Munro JT; Young SW
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Sep; 89(9):1009-1015. PubMed ID: 30497094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.
    Na'aya HU; Madziga AG; Eni UE
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 19485153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chlorhexidine-coated surgical gloves influence the bacterial flora of hands over a period of 3 hours.
    Suchomel M; Brillmann M; Assadian O; Ousey KJ; Presterl E
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():108. PubMed ID: 30202521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection.
    Misteli H; Weber WP; Reck S; Rosenthal R; Zwahlen M; Fueglistaler P; Bolli MK; Oertli D; Widmer AF; Marti WR
    Arch Surg; 2009 Jun; 144(6):553-8; discussion 558. PubMed ID: 19528389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial contamination of clinical examination gloves.
    McDaniel TF; Daugherty D; Wilson S
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 17333963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of post-operative complications following wisdom tooth surgery performed with sterile or clean gloves.
    Chiu WK; Cheung LK; Chan HC; Chow LK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 35(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 16154315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.
    Gani JS; Anseline PF; Bissett RL
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 2327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of open and closed staff-assisted glove donning on the nature of surgical glove cuff contamination.
    Jones C; Brooker B; Genon M
    ANZ J Surg; 2010 Mar; 80(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 20575921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.