220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20864270)
1. Helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients: an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Lukarski D; Köhler C; Wlodarczyk W; Ebert A; Budach V; Schneider A; Stromberger C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 20864270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Application value of reduced field intensity modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer].
DU XL; Sheng XG; Wang C; Yu H; Song QQ; Pan CX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 35(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24506963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a dosimetric comparison with both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Clemente S; Wu B; Sanguineti G; Fusco V; Ricchetti F; Wong J; McNutt T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(4):1248-55. PubMed ID: 20947268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer: a comparison of dosimetric and clinical outcomes with conventional radiotherapy.
Du XL; Tao J; Sheng XG; Lu CH; Yu H; Wang C; Song QQ; Li QS; Pan CX
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 22198339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.
Chitapanarux I; Tharavichitkul E; Nobnop W; Wanwilairat S; Vongtama R; Traisathit P
J Radiat Res; 2015 May; 56(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 25720771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison between helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans for non-small cell lung cancer.
Meng LL; Feng LC; Wang YL; Dai XK; Xie CB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jun; 124(11):1667-71. PubMed ID: 21740774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extended-field bone marrow sparing radiotherapy for primary chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymphadenopathy: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus helical tomotherapy.
Chen JL; Wang MC; Huang YS; Huang CY; Pan CK; Hsu CY; Lan KH; Kuo SH
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 31904003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral and bilateral neck SIB for head and neck cancer patients : Intensity-modulated proton therapy, tomotherapy, and RapidArc.
Stromberger C; Cozzi L; Budach V; Fogliata A; Ghadjar P; Wlodarczyk W; Jamil B; Raguse JD; Böttcher A; Marnitz S
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Apr; 192(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 26852243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for nasopharynx cancer with helical tomotherapy. A planning study.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Chiara A; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Sep; 183(9):497-505. PubMed ID: 17762924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helical tomotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after laparoscopic staging in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of feasibility and early toxicity.
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Burova E; Wlodarczyk W; Jahn U; Grün A; Budach V; Stromberger C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e137-43. PubMed ID: 21600704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does helical tomotherapy improve dose conformity and normal tissue sparing compared to conventional IMRT? A dosimetric comparison in high risk prostate cancer.
Murthy V; Mallik S; Master Z; Sharma PK; Mahantshetty U; Shrivastava SK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Apr; 10(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 21381796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity modulated proton beam radiation for brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Clivio A; Kluge A; Cozzi L; Köhler C; Neumann O; Vanetti E; Wlodarczyk W; Marnitz S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 24119834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Duodenal and other gastrointestinal toxicity in cervical and endometrial cancer treated with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy to paraaortic lymph nodes.
Poorvu PD; Sadow CA; Townamchai K; Damato AL; Viswanathan AN
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Apr; 85(5):1262-8. PubMed ID: 23182395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dosimetric study of postoperative 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and coplanar decile intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer].
Jiang J; Zhang L; Liao S; Huagn R
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1201-5. PubMed ID: 22931623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
