These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20865092)

  • 1. Specifying exposure classification parameters for sensitivity analysis: family breast cancer history.
    Jurek AM; Lash TL; Maldonado G
    Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 1():109-17. PubMed ID: 20865092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
    Corbin M; Haslett S; Pearce N; Maule M; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 46(3):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28338966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction of odds ratios in case-control studies for exposure misclassification with partial knowledge of the degree of agreement among experts who assessed exposures.
    Burstyn I; Gustafson P; Pintos J; Lavoué J; Siemiatycki J
    Occup Environ Med; 2018 Feb; 75(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 29089391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of misclassification of causes of death in verbal autopsy: can it be adjusted?
    Chandramohan D; Setel P; Quigley M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 30(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 11416073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misclassification Adjustment of Family History of Breast Cancer in a Case-Control Study: a Bayesian Approach.
    Moradzadeh R; Mansournia MA; Baghfalaki T; Ghiasvand R; Noori-Daloii MR; Holakouie-Naieni K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8221-6. PubMed ID: 26745064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach.
    Chu H; Wang Z; Cole SR; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):834-41. PubMed ID: 16843678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A sensitivity analysis to separate bias due to confounding from bias due to predicting misclassification by a variable that does both.
    Lash TL; Silliman RA
    Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 10955407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inflation of type I error rates due to differential misclassification in EHR-derived outcomes: Empirical illustration using breast cancer recurrence.
    Chen Y; Wang J; Chubak J; Hubbard RA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30375122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing external and internal validation methods in correcting outcome misclassification bias in logistic regression: A simulation study and application to the case of postsurgical venous thromboembolism following total hip and knee arthroplasty.
    Ni J; Dasgupta K; Kahn SR; Talbot D; Lefebvre G; Lix LM; Berry G; Burman M; Dimentberg R; Laflamme Y; Cirkovic A; Rahme E
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 30515908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying and Adjusting for Disease Misclassification Due to Loss to Follow-Up in Historical Cohort Mortality Studies.
    Scott LL; Maldonado G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):12834-46. PubMed ID: 26501295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of non-differential outcome misclassification on estimates of the attributable and prevented fraction.
    Hsieh CC
    Stat Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):361-73. PubMed ID: 2028120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A practical approach to estimating the true effect of exposure despite imprecise exposure classification.
    Weinkam JJ; Rosenbaum WL; Sterling TD
    Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):587-601. PubMed ID: 2053577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the positive predictive value to correct for disease misclassification in epidemiologic studies.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Dec; 138(11):1007-15. PubMed ID: 8256775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust bayesian sensitivity analysis for case-control studies with uncertain exposure misclassification probabilities.
    Mak TS; Best N; Rushton L
    Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 25720128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure.
    Birkett NJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 136(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 1415154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables.
    Fox MP; Lash TL; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 34(6):1370-6. PubMed ID: 16172102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for multiple-misclassified variables in a study using birth certificates.
    Jurek AM; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):515-20. PubMed ID: 23800408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External validation, repeat determination, and precision of risk estimation in misclassified exposure data in epidemiology.
    Duffy SW; Maximovitch DM; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Dec; 46(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 1494080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review.
    Höfler M
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2005; 14(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 16175878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.