These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20865285)

  • 1. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.
    McNally D; Naylor J; Johnson S
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S612-7. PubMed ID: 22411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.
    Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.
    Vogt M; Zengerle L; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 37660895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
    Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical total disc replacement exhibits similar stiffness to intact cervical functional spinal units tested on a dynamic pendulum testing system.
    Esmende SM; Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 25194516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.
    Lou J; Li Y; Wang B; Meng Y; Wu T; Liu H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(41):e8291. PubMed ID: 29019902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Wojewnik B; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Zelenakova J; McIntosh B; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S585-91. PubMed ID: 22476636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of posterior decompressive procedures on segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Brody MJ; Patel AA; Ghanayem AJ; Wojewnik B; Carandang G; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Vastardis G; Potluri T; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1558-63. PubMed ID: 24979138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does a novel knitted titanium nucleus prosthesis change the kinematics of a cervical spine segment? A biomechanical cadaveric study.
    Ziegler P; Kaps HP; Goerke S; Tendulkar G; Buck Sen A; Nuessler A; Schmoelz W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Mar; 63():134-139. PubMed ID: 30889432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of cervical posterior foraminotomy on segmental range of motion in the setting of total disc arthroplasty.
    Bevevino AJ; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Gwinn DE; Dmitriev AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1572-7. PubMed ID: 24921846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.