58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20865609)
1. Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage.
Gregorczyk KN; Hasselquist L; Schiffman JM; Bensel CK; Obusek JP; Gutekunst DJ
Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1263-75. PubMed ID: 20865609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of a passive military exoskeleton in off-loading weight during static and dynamic load carriage: A randomised cross-over study.
Kong PW; Koh AH; Ho MYM; Iskandar MNS; Lim CXE
Appl Ergon; 2024 Sep; 119():104293. PubMed ID: 38703721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metabolic Costs of Walking with Weighted Vests.
Looney DP; Lavoie EM; Notley SR; Holden LD; Arcidiacono DM; Potter AW; Silder A; Pasiakos SM; Arellano CJ; Karis AJ; Pryor JL; Santee WR; Friedl KE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Jun; 56(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 38291646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender Differences in Energy Expenditure During Walking With Backpack and Double-Pack Loads.
Li SSW; Chan OHT; Ng TY; Kam LH; Ng CY; Chung WC; Chow DHK
Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; ():18720818799190. PubMed ID: 30216092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the Influence of Structured Familiarization to an Adjustable, Passive Load-Bearing Exoskeleton on Oxygen Consumption and Lower Limb Muscle Activation During Walking.
Diamond-Ouellette G; Le Quang M; Karakolis T; Bouyer LJ; Best KL
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024 Jun; PP():. PubMed ID: 38935466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Himalayan porter's specialization: metabolic power, economy, efficiency and skill.
Minetti AE; Formenti F; Ardigò LP
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Nov; 273(1602):2791-7. PubMed ID: 17015318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Center of Pressure, Vertical Ground Reaction Forces, and Neuromuscular Responses of Special-Forces Soldiers to 43-km Load Carriage in the Field.
Scales J; O'Driscoll JM; Coleman D; Giannoglou D; Gkougkoulis I; Ntontis I; Zisopoulou C; Brown M
J Appl Biomech; 2020 Oct; 36(5):307-312. PubMed ID: 32796136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generating electricity while walking with a medial-lateral oscillating load carriage device.
Martin JP; Li Q
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Jul; 6(7):182021. PubMed ID: 31417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tapping Into Skeletal Muscle Biomechanics for Design and Control of Lower Limb Exoskeletons: A Narrative Review.
Mahdian ZS; Wang H; Refai MIM; Durandau G; Sartori M; MacLean MK
J Appl Biomech; 2023 Oct; 39(5):318-333. PubMed ID: 37751903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical and physiological effects of female soldier load carriage: A scoping review.
Wendland R; Bossi L; Oliver M
Appl Ergon; 2022 Nov; 105():103837. PubMed ID: 35803166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Running With an Elastic Lower Limb Exoskeleton.
Cherry MS; Kota S; Young A; Ferris DP
J Appl Biomech; 2016 Jun; 32(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 26694976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of passive ankle exoskeletons on neuromuscular function during exaggerated standing sway.
Farris DJ; Po JCN; Yee J; Williamson JL; Dick TJM
R Soc Open Sci; 2024 May; 11(5):230590. PubMed ID: 38716327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exoskeletal solutions to enable mobility with a lower leg fracture in austere environments.
Johnson WB; Young A; Goldman S; Wilson J; Alderete JF; Childers WL
Wearable Technol; 2023; 4():e5. PubMed ID: 38487779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and testing of the aerial porter exoskeleton.
Martin WB; Boehler A; Hollander KW; Kinney D; Hitt JK; Kudva J; Sugar TG
Wearable Technol; 2022; 3():e1. PubMed ID: 38486913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing optimized exoskeleton assistance of the hip, knee, and ankle in single and multi-joint configurations.
Franks PW; Bryan GM; Martin RM; Reyes R; Lakmazaheri AC; Collins SH
Wearable Technol; 2021; 2():e16. PubMed ID: 38486633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opportunities and challenges in the development of exoskeletons for locomotor assistance.
Siviy C; Baker LM; Quinlivan BT; Porciuncula F; Swaminathan K; Awad LN; Walsh CJ
Nat Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 7(4):456-472. PubMed ID: 36550303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gait Recognition for Lower Limb Exoskeletons Based on Interactive Information Fusion.
Chen W; Li J; Zhu S; Zhang X; Men Y; Wu H
Appl Bionics Biomech; 2022; 2022():9933018. PubMed ID: 35378794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spine-like Joint Link Mechanism to Design Wearable Assistive Devices.
Kim JY; Cho JS; Kim JH; Kim JT; Han SC; Park SS; Yoon HU
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward Predicting Human Performance Outcomes From Wearable Technologies: A Computational Modeling Approach.
Brunyé TT; Yau K; Okano K; Elliott G; Olenich S; Giles GE; Navarro E; Elkin-Frankston S; Young AL; Miller EL
Front Physiol; 2021; 12():738973. PubMed ID: 34566701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison of the effect of innovative designed storing-restoring hybrid passive AFO versus posterior leaf spring AFO on ankle joint kinematic in drop foot patients: A case series using a single subject design.
Pourhoseingholi E; Kamali M; Saeedi H; Jalali M
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2020; 34():173. PubMed ID: 33816372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
