These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20865613)
1. A critical review of electrical water-bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies. Shields SJ; Raj AB J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2010; 13(4):281-99. PubMed ID: 20865613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of electrical water bath stunning current frequencies on the spontaneous electroencephalogram and somatosensory evoked potentials in hens. Raj AB; O'Callaghan M Br Poult Sci; 2004 Apr; 45(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 15222420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens, and ducks. Hindle VA; Lambooij E; Reimert HG; Workel LD; Gerritzen MA Poult Sci; 2010 Mar; 89(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 20181854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diversity, not uniformity: slaughter and electrical waterbath stunning procedures in Belgian slaughterhouses. Devos G; Moons CPH; Houf K Poult Sci; 2018 Sep; 97(9):3369-3379. PubMed ID: 29788386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Duration of wing flapping in chickens shackled before slaughter. Gregory NG; Bell JC Vet Rec; 1987 Dec; 121(24):567-9. PubMed ID: 3433647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-only followed by cardiac arrest electrical stunning is an effective alternative to head-only electrical stunning in pigs. Vogel KD; Badtram G; Claus JR; Grandin T; Turpin S; Weyker RE; Voogd E J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1412-8. PubMed ID: 21183712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Welfare during stunning and slaughter of poultry. Raj M Poult Sci; 1998 Dec; 77(12):1815-9. PubMed ID: 9872584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Animal welfare and workers' protection during electric stunning of poultry for slaughter]. Wormuth HJ; Schütt-Abraham I Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1989 Mar; 96(3):104-7. PubMed ID: 2651067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrocorticogram spectral analysis and somatosensory evoked potentials as tools to assess electrical stunning efficiency in ducks. Beyssen C; Babile R; Fernandez X Br Poult Sci; 2004 Jun; 45(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 15327129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of electrical stun/kill method, interval between killing and neck cutting and blood vessels cut on blood loss and meat quality in broilers. Raj AB; Wilkins LJ; O'Callaghan M; Phillips AJ Br Poult Sci; 2001 Mar; 42(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 11337968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-cloaca controlled current stunning: assessment of brain and heart activity and meat quality. Lambooij E; Reimert HG; Workel LD; Hindle VA Br Poult Sci; 2012; 53(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 22646781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of alternative electrical stunning parameters on the ability of broilers to recover consciousness and meat quality. Bourassa DV; Bowker BC; Zhuang H; Wilson KM; Harris CE; Buhr RJ Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(9):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28854742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone restraining and head-only electrical stunning in broilers: effects on physiological responses and meat quality. Lambooij E; Reimert HG; Verhoeven MT; Hindle VA Poult Sci; 2014 Mar; 93(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 24604842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical waterbath stunning: influence of different waveform and voltage settings on the induction of unconsciousness and death in male and female broiler chickens. Prinz S; Van Oijen G; Ehinger F; Bessei W; Coenen A Poult Sci; 2012 Apr; 91(4):998-1008. PubMed ID: 22399740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Review of Different Stunning Methods for Poultry-Animal Welfare Aspects (Stunning Methods for Poultry). Berg C; Raj M Animals (Basel); 2015 Nov; 5(4):1207-19. PubMed ID: 26633521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of electrical stunning on somatosensory evoked potentials in chickens. Gregory NG; Wotton SB Br Vet J; 1989; 145(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2713636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the effectiveness of handheld stunners for stunning chickens. Gregory NG; Wotton SB Vet Rec; 1990 Mar; 126(12):290-1. PubMed ID: 2343512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-only electrical stunning of poultry using a waterbath: a feasibility study. Lines JA; Raj AB; Wotton SB; O'Callaghan M; Knowles TG Br Poult Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 21919570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of electrical water bath stunning on physical reflexes of broilers: evaluation of stunning efficacy under field conditions. Girasole M; Marrone R; Anastasio A; Chianese A; Mercogliano R; Cortesi ML Poult Sci; 2016 May; 95(5):1205-10. PubMed ID: 26957628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]