These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20866358)

  • 1. Voter model on a directed network: role of bidirectional opinion exchanges.
    Han SG; Um J; Kim BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 May; 81(5 Pt 2):057103. PubMed ID: 20866358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear q-voter model.
    Castellano C; Muñoz MA; Pastor-Satorras R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Oct; 80(4 Pt 1):041129. PubMed ID: 19905295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model.
    Khalil N; San Miguel M; Toral R
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012310. PubMed ID: 29448335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of active phase in coevolving nonlinear voter model.
    Jędrzejewski A; Toruniewska J; Suchecki K; Zaikin O; Hołyst JA
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Oct; 102(4-1):042313. PubMed ID: 33212744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase transition in a coevolving network of conformist and contrarian voters.
    Yi SD; Baek SK; Zhu CP; Kim BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jan; 87(1):012806. PubMed ID: 23410387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitness voter model: Damped oscillations and anomalous consensus.
    Woolcock A; Connaughton C; Merali Y; Vazquez F
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Sep; 96(3-1):032313. PubMed ID: 29346969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetric coevolutionary voter dynamics.
    Wieland S; Nunes A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Dec; 88(6):062809. PubMed ID: 24483513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitting in and breaking up: A nonlinear version of coevolving voter models.
    Kureh YH; Porter MA
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jun; 101(6-1):062303. PubMed ID: 32688568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of social diversity on the emergence of global consensus in opinion dynamics.
    Yang HX; Wu ZX; Zhou C; Zhou T; Wang BH
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Oct; 80(4 Pt 2):046108. PubMed ID: 19905391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamics of majority rule with differential latencies.
    Scheidler A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Mar; 83(3 Pt 1):031116. PubMed ID: 21517463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint effect of ageing and multilayer structure prevents ordering in the voter model.
    Artime O; Fernández-Gracia J; Ramasco JJ; San Miguel M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7166. PubMed ID: 28769089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opinion dynamics on an adaptive random network.
    Benczik IJ; Benczik SZ; Schmittmann B; Zia RK
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Apr; 79(4 Pt 2):046104. PubMed ID: 19518298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Update rules and interevent time distributions: slow ordering versus no ordering in the voter model.
    Fernández-Gracia J; Eguíluz VM; San Miguel M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Jul; 84(1 Pt 2):015103. PubMed ID: 21867243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opinion formation on adaptive networks with intensive average degree.
    Schmittmann B; Mukhopadhyay A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Dec; 82(6 Pt 2):066104. PubMed ID: 21230702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterogeneous voter models.
    Masuda N; Gibert N; Redner S
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Jul; 82(1 Pt 1):010103. PubMed ID: 20866551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model.
    Klamser PP; Wiedermann M; Donges JF; Donner RV
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Nov; 96(5-1):052315. PubMed ID: 29347768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters?
    Mobilia M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jul; 91(2):028701. PubMed ID: 12906515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks.
    Castellano C; Loreto V; Barrat A; Cecconi F; Parisi D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Jun; 71(6 Pt 2):066107. PubMed ID: 16089820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized Independence in the
    Abramiuk A; Sznajd-Weron K
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of latent voters.
    Lambiotte R; Saramäki J; Blondel VD
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Apr; 79(4 Pt 2):046107. PubMed ID: 19518301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.