These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20868549)
1. Ideas for appraisal. Holden J Educ Prim Care; 2010 Sep; 21(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 20868549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sessional GPs: support needed to provide the evidence required for appraisal and revalidation. Wharton R; Pollard K Educ Prim Care; 2010 Sep; 21(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 20868546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice. Rutherford A Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21301690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A proposal for practice nurse appraisal: report of a pilot project. Horman L; Hellens J; Baker M Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 25625835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the experiences of general practice nurse peer appraisers. Ferguson J; Kennedy S Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 25625834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The eyes have it. Williamson C Health Serv J; 1994 Jan; 104(5385):22-4. PubMed ID: 10164887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review in clinical radiology practice. Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Endorsement of peer review. John H; Erb N; Rowe IF Clin Med (Lond); 2010 Dec; 10(6):639-40. PubMed ID: 21416672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using clinical audit in practice: a pilot peer review project. Holt VP; Earp DP Prim Dent Care; 1996 Sep; 3(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 10332335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Setting up interdepartmental peer review. The British Thoracic Society's scheme. Page RL; Harrison BD J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 7473328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of the peer review council. Pedersen A; Crabtree T; Ortiz-Tomei T Medsurg Nurs; 2004 Jun; 13(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15219165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postgraduate certificate for GP appraisers. Bell J; Scallan S Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):442. PubMed ID: 22413670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the spread of appraisals throughout the year: a pilot of two management strategies. Peters A; Ceasar S; Scallan S Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):452-3. PubMed ID: 22413673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: preparing the evaluator. Meredith S Can J Nurs Adm; 1994; 7(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 7918514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A peer review program for professional nurses. Cohen B; Berube R; Turrentine B J Nurs Staff Dev; 1996; 12(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 8699271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General practice 8 till 8. Spence D BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f6162. PubMed ID: 24133126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving quality in general practice: what does it really require? Wilcock P Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(5):297-9. PubMed ID: 21114909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who's complacent now? The King's Fund on general practice. Heath I BMJ; 2011 Apr; 342():d2254. PubMed ID: 21490040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Summarizing evidence: how far should we go? de Sutter A Eur J Gen Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 21506901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]