These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20868549)

  • 41. Peer appraisal of consultants--the way forward?
    Johnson JN
    Postgrad Med J; 1999 Jun; 75(884):325. PubMed ID: 10435163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How to chart for peer review.
    Raymond L
    RN; 2001 Jun; 64(6):67-70. PubMed ID: 12032935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The RCGP's new standing group on overdiagnosis.
    McCartney M; Treadwell J
    BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4454. PubMed ID: 25008352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Seventh-year itch.
    Miller S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Jan; 69(678):35. PubMed ID: 30591610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Talking about death is not outrageous--reducing it to a tickbox exercise is.
    McCartney M
    BMJ; 2014 Aug; 349():g5369. PubMed ID: 25171925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Application of peer review in investigating allegations of medical negligence and malpractice.
    Habibzadeh F
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Jan; 14(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 21194263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Creating a clinical practice development model.
    Haag-Heitman B; Kramer A
    Am J Nurs; 1998 Aug; 98(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 9711148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Automated dispensing machines need approval.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Jun; 27(6):78, 83. PubMed ID: 12108403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. One peer review organization's experience in developing hospital peer groups.
    Sumner BM; Thompson MS; Suarez WG; Davis M; Bell JA; Shanedling SB
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 10135642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is verification of peer review service necessary to support scientific growth?
    Royal KD; Hardie EM
    Am J Surg; 2018 Aug; 216(2):202-203. PubMed ID: 29198855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Developing a peer review system. One HMO's experience.
    Komelasky AL; Bridgers C; Golas G; Pence D; Woodard I
    Adv Nurse Pract; 1997 Apr; 5(4):73-7. PubMed ID: 9459902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The objective impact of clinical peer review on hospital quality and safety.
    Edwards MT
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 21169223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peer reviews: taking on new meanings.
    Raia L
    Nurs Adm Q; 2011; 35(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 21403491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Move from measurement to data intelligence.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Dec; 29(12):174-6. PubMed ID: 15597909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. QOF.
    Stokes T; Bent N; Sutcliffe D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Nov; 60(580):853. PubMed ID: 21062553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. QOF.
    Ashton J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Nov; 60(580):853-4. PubMed ID: 21062552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. General questions about Peer Review.
    Tseng I
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Dec; 91(12):20. PubMed ID: 20066862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Heighten individual accountability through peer review.
    Moorer-Whitehead K
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Apr; 41(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 20375673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Twelve tips for implementing a successful peer assessment.
    Finn GM; Garner J
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 21355687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MSNJ's judicial review process.
    Trayner EM
    N J Med; 2001 Sep; 98(9):21-2. PubMed ID: 11586880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.