These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20868895)

  • 1. Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.
    Berg WA; Sechtin AG; Marques H; Zhang Z
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):931-87. PubMed ID: 20868895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
    Chiorean AR; Duma MM; Dudea SM; Bolboaca S; Dumitriu D; Eniu D; Sfrangeu SA
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
    Berg WA; Campassi CI; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 12668745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy?
    Daly CP; Bailey JE; Klein KA; Helvie MA
    Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 18423318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cysts within Otherwise Probably Benign Solid Breast Masses and the Risk of Malignancy.
    Jales RM; Araujo KG; Sarian LO; Serra KP; Keppke H; Francisco J; Derchain SF
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 38(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 27093646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic differentiation of benign and malignant cystic lesions of the breast.
    Chang YW; Kwon KH; Goo DE; Choi DL; Lee HK; Yang SB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17182708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Streaming detection for evaluation of indeterminate sonographic breast masses: a pilot study.
    Soo MS; Ghate SV; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Warwick BN; Ramachandran AR; Nightingale KR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1335-41. PubMed ID: 16632728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mucocele-like tumors of the breast as cystic lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
    Kim SM; Kim HH; Kang DK; Shin HJ; Cho N; Park JM; Cha JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1424-30. PubMed ID: 21606308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
    Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aliasing artifact depicted on ultrasound (US)-elastography for breast cystic lesions mimicking solid masses.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Kim SJ; Lyou CY; Choi HY
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21498318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cystic breast lesions: sonographic findings and clinical management.
    Rinaldi P; Ierardi C; Costantini M; Magno S; Giuliani M; Belli P; Bonomo L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1617-26. PubMed ID: 20966473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
    Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast.
    Staren ED
    Am Surg; 1995 Jul; 61(7):619-26; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 7793744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sonographic findings and differing clinical implications of simple, complicated, and complex breast cysts.
    Huff JG
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2009 Nov; 7(10):1101-4; quiz 1105. PubMed ID: 19930976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographically-guided fine needle aspiration in differential diagnosis of cystic versus solid rounded masses smaller than 2 cm detected at mammographic screening.
    Thurfjell E
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Oct; 75(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 12353811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cystic lesions: Not so simple after all? An ultrasonographic tactical approach.
    Ciurea AI; Iacoban CG; Herţa HA; Ciortea CA
    Med Ultrason; 2018 Feb; 1(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 29400375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probably Benign Breast Nodular Lesions (BI-RADS 3): Correlation between Ultrasound Features and Histologic Findings.
    Pistolese CA; Tosti D; Citraro D; Ricci F; Di Stefano C; Lamacchia F; Ferrari D; Floris R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 30340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.