These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20869033)

  • 1. Inference of unexpected genetic relatedness among individuals in HapMap Phase III.
    Pemberton TJ; Wang C; Li JZ; Rosenberg NA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2010 Oct; 87(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 20869033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unexpected relationships and inbreeding in HapMap phase III populations.
    Stevens EL; Baugher JD; Shirley MD; Frelin LP; Pevsner J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49575. PubMed ID: 23185369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.
    Conomos MP; Miller MB; Thornton TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):276-93. PubMed ID: 25810074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case study of the utility of the HapMap database for pharmacogenomic haplotype analysis in the Taiwanese population.
    Lin E; Hwang Y; Tzeng CM
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2006; 10(6):367-70. PubMed ID: 17154653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How well do HapMap haplotypes identify common haplotypes of genes? A comparison with haplotypes of 334 genes resequenced in the environmental genome project.
    Taylor JA; Xu ZL; Kaplan NL; Morris RW
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 16434598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tag SNP selection for Finnish individuals based on the CEPH Utah HapMap database.
    Willer CJ; Scott LJ; Bonnycastle LL; Jackson AU; Chines P; Pruim R; Bark CW; Tsai YY; Pugh EW; Doheny KF; Kinnunen L; Mohlke KL; Valle TT; Bergman RN; Tuomilehto J; Collins FS; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 16374835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Singapore Genome Variation Project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations.
    Teo YY; Sim X; Ong RT; Tan AK; Chen J; Tantoso E; Small KS; Ku CS; Lee EJ; Seielstad M; Chia KS
    Genome Res; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2154-62. PubMed ID: 19700652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The International HapMap Project Web site.
    Thorisson GA; Smith AV; Krishnan L; Stein LD
    Genome Res; 2005 Nov; 15(11):1592-3. PubMed ID: 16251469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using population mixtures to optimize the utility of genomic databases: linkage disequilibrium and association study design in India.
    Pemberton TJ; Jakobsson M; Conrad DF; Coop G; Wall JD; Pritchard JK; Patel PI; Rosenberg NA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 72(Pt 4):535-46. PubMed ID: 18513279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of phasing algorithms for trios and unrelated individuals.
    Marchini J; Cutler D; Patterson N; Stephens M; Eskin E; Halperin E; Lin S; Qin ZS; Munro HM; Abecasis GR; Donnelly P;
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 78(3):437-50. PubMed ID: 16465620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generating samples for association studies based on HapMap data.
    Li J; Chen Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():44. PubMed ID: 18218094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of population stratification using random SNPs in genome-wide association studies].
    Cao ZF; Ma CX; Wang L; Cai B
    Yi Chuan; 2010 Sep; 32(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 20870613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism.
    Clark AG; Hubisz MJ; Bustamante CD; Williamson SH; Nielsen R
    Genome Res; 2005 Nov; 15(11):1496-502. PubMed ID: 16251459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tag SNPs chosen from HapMap perform well in several population isolates.
    Service S; ; Sabatti C; Freimer N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 17323370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.
    Conrad DF; Jakobsson M; Coop G; Wen X; Wall JD; Rosenberg NA; Pritchard JK
    Nat Genet; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1251-60. PubMed ID: 17057719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel statistical algorithm for enhancing the utility of HapMap data to design genomic association studies in non-HapMap populations.
    Sarkar-Roy N; Mondal D; Bhattacharya P; Majumder P
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2011; 5(6):706-16. PubMed ID: 22295752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of close relatives in the HUGO Pan-Asian SNP database.
    Yang X; Xu S; ;
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29502. PubMed ID: 22242128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that map to gaps in the human SNP map.
    Tsui C; Coleman LE; Griffith JL; Bennett EA; Goodson SG; Scott JD; Pittard WS; Devine SE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Aug; 31(16):4910-6. PubMed ID: 12907734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation.
    McCarroll SA; Kuruvilla FG; Korn JM; Cawley S; Nemesh J; Wysoker A; Shapero MH; de Bakker PI; Maller JB; Kirby A; Elliott AL; Parkin M; Hubbell E; Webster T; Mei R; Veitch J; Collins PJ; Handsaker R; Lincoln S; Nizzari M; Blume J; Jones KW; Rava R; Daly MJ; Gabriel SB; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2008 Oct; 40(10):1166-74. PubMed ID: 18776908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.