243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20870379)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy.
Kitada M; Nakamura N; Iwana D; Kakimoto A; Nishii T; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):674-9. PubMed ID: 20870379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.
Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lecoz L; Flecher X; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23806349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system.
Hayashi S; Nishiyama T; Fujishiro T; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Nishida K; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Int Orthop; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1063-8. PubMed ID: 23512603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigation in femoral-shaft fractures--from lab tests to clinical routine.
Wilharm A; Gras F; Rausch S; Linder R; Marintschev I; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
Injury; 2011 Nov; 42(11):1346-52. PubMed ID: 21724185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty.
Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips.
Murayama T; Ohnishi H; Mori T; Okazaki Y; Sujita K; Sakai A
Int Orthop; 2015 Jun; 39(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 25488511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.
Dorr LD; Malik A; Dastane M; Wan Z
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 18979146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical accuracy and precision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty using computed tomography-based navigation.
Sato R; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Marumo K; Sugano N
Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1807-1814. PubMed ID: 30135983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.
Nakahara I; Kyo T; Kuroda Y; Miki H
J Artif Organs; 2018 Sep; 21(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 29611147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Leg lengthening and femoral-offset reduction after total hip arthroplasty: where is the problem - stem or cup positioning?
Al-Amiry B; Mahmood S; Krupic F; Sayed-Noor A
Acta Radiol; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1125-1131. PubMed ID: 28068823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in CT-free navigated total hip arthroplasty.
Fukunishi S; Fukui T; Imamura F; Nishio S
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral pinless length and offset measurements during computer-assisted, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Schuster T; Weber M; Grifka J; Woerner M
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1021-5. PubMed ID: 24269098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Total hip arthroplasty with shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy and custom-made prosthesis in Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia].
Starker M; Bischof F; Lindenfeld T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 21984422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option?
Pasquier G; Ducharne G; Ali ES; Giraud F; Mouttet A; Durante E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 96(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 20471935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography-based surgical navigation for hip arthroplasty.
Ecker TM; Tannast M; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():100-5. PubMed ID: 17876286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustment of leg length using imageless navigation THA software without a femoral tracker.
Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Fukui T; Fujihara Y; Yoshiya S
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 21394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.
Manzotti A; Cerveri P; De Momi E; Pullen C; Confalonieri N
Int Orthop; 2011 Jan; 35(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19904533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
