133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20870495)
21. Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.
Cross E; Goodacre S; O'Cathain A; Arnold J
Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 15735262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Dealing with bottlenecks in health care: legal implications].
Katzenmeier C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 20870484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Criteria for an ethically adequate prioritisation of individualised treatment strategies].
Schleidgen S; Marckmann G
Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Nov; 76(11):e57-64. PubMed ID: 25350389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of health needs assessment and prioritisation on District Health Board planning in New Zealand.
Coster G; Mays N; Scott C; Cumming J
Int J Health Plann Manage; 2009; 24(4):276-89. PubMed ID: 19946944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The views of physicians and politicians concerning age-related prioritisation in healthcare.
Werntoft E; Edberg AK
J Health Organ Manag; 2009; 23(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 19455877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Local prioritisation work in health care--assessment of an implementation process.
Waldau S
Health Policy; 2007 May; 81(2-3):133-45. PubMed ID: 16824642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Public policy and private sector provision of health services.
Rosenthal G; Newbrander W
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1996; 11(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 10162428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Deliberative participation of citizens in the prioritisation debate: what is their contribution?].
Stumpf S; Raspe H
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 22857729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Rationalization versus rationing in surgery].
Nagel E; Meyer zu Vilsendorf A; Pichlmayr R
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():627-31. PubMed ID: 9574225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Priority setting and bedside rationing: a discussion of empirical findings].
Strech D
Onkologie; 2011; 34 Suppl 1():16-9. PubMed ID: 21389764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Prioritization: the clinical perspective].
Wallesch CW
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Apr; 51(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 22570159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Budget problems in rehabilitation].
Buschmann-Steinhage R
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Apr; 51(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 22570154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The right to treatment: priority or rationing?].
Berlinguer G
Recenti Prog Med; 1999 Nov; 90(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 10608153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dealing with bottlenecks in health care--ethical issues].
Schöne-Seifert B
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 20707974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Who is entitled to what?
Lamm RD
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Sep; 57(9):74-7. PubMed ID: 14503147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Delphi study to identify healthcare users' priorities for cancer care in Greece.
Efstathiou N; Ameen J; Coll AM
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Sep; 12(4):362-71. PubMed ID: 18547866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [How can priorities be set in medical services? A Swedish model].
Meyer T; Raspe H
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Oct; 71(10):617-22. PubMed ID: 19885762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Resource allocation in orthopaedics: economic evaluation to priority setting.
Bate A; Donaldson C; Ray H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():49-56. PubMed ID: 17290157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
