BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20870535)

  • 1. The influence of the type of contraction on the masseter muscle EMG power spectrum.
    Nadeau S; Bilodeau M; Delisle A; Chmielewski W; Arsenault AB; Gravel D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1993; 3(4):205-13. PubMed ID: 20870535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of gender on the EMG power spectrum during an increasing force level.
    Bilodeau M; Arsenault AB; Gravel D; Bourbonnais D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1992; 2(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 20719605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the EMG power spectrum of the human soleus and gastrocnemius muscles.
    Bilodeau M; Goulet C; Nadeau S; Arsenault AB; Gravel D
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1994; 68(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 8076618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EMG power spectra of elbow extensors during ramp and step isometric contractions.
    Bilodeau M; Arsenault AB; Gravel D; Bourbonnais D
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1991; 63(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 1915327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in soleus motoneuron pool reflex excitability and surface EMG parameters during fatiguing low- vs. high-intensity isometric contractions.
    Pääsuke M; Rannama L; Ereline J; Gapeyeva H; Oöpik V
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(7-8):341-50. PubMed ID: 18051628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EMG power spectrum and features of the superimposed M-wave during voluntary eccentric and concentric actions at different activation levels.
    Linnamo V; Strojnik V; Komi PV
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Apr; 86(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 11944102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of muscle fatigue as assessed by electromyography and mechanomyography during continuous and intermittent low-force contractions: effects of the feedback mode.
    Madeleine P; Jørgensen LV; Søgaard K; Arendt-Nielsen L; Sjøgaard G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 May; 87(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 12012073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanomyogram and electromyogram analyses during isometric contraction in human masseter muscle.
    Ioi H; Kawakatsu M; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 19113076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of interelectrode distance on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):482-95. PubMed ID: 15935960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EMG power spectrum of elbow extensors: a reliability study.
    Bilodeau M; Arsenault AB; Gravel D; Bourbonnais D
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994; 34(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 8045246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of power spectrum density function of EMG during muscle contraction below 30%MVC.
    Roman-Liu D; Konarska M
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):864-74. PubMed ID: 18590966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface EMG frequency dependence on force in the masseter and the anterior temporal muscles.
    Hagberg C; Hagberg M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Oct; 96(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 3201119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of step and ramp static contractions on the median frequency of electromyograms of back muscles in humans.
    Larivière C; Arsenault AB; Gravel D; Gagnon D; Loisel P
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Oct; 85(6):552-9. PubMed ID: 11718284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time and frequency domain responses of the mechanomyogram and electromyogram during isometric ramp contractions: a comparison of the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms.
    Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Egan AD; Hartman MJ; Herda TJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17070700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of rate of force development on EMG amplitude and frequency.
    Ricard MD; Ugrinowitsch C; Parcell AC; Hilton S; Rubley MD; Sawyer R; Poole CR
    Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 15643537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions.
    Ryan ED; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR; Housh TJ; Cramer JT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 18061275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The behaviour of the mean power frequency of the surface electromyogram in biceps brachii with increasing force and during fatigue. With special regard to the electrode distance.
    Gerdle B; Eriksson NE; Brundin L
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Dec; 30(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 2286173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of force and fatigue in isometric contractions of the upper trapezius muscle by surface EMG signal and perceived exertion scale.
    Troiano A; Naddeo F; Sosso E; Camarota G; Merletti R; Mesin L
    Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 18490165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of electromyographic activity during eccentrically versus concentrically loaded isometric contractions.
    Garner JC; Blackburn T; Weimar W; Campbell B
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Jun; 18(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 17257859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-individual variability among the mechanomyographic and electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp muscle actions.
    Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 17557649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.