These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20871175)

  • 1. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.
    Perham N; Banbury SP; Jones DM
    Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 17469024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of semantic relatedness on recall of stimuli preceding emotional oddballs.
    Smith RM; Beversdorf DQ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):620-8. PubMed ID: 18577291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Jahncke H
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Nov; 74(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20688422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval from memory: vulnerable or inviolable?
    Jones DM; Marsh JE; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 22250910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity?
    Beaman CP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1106-18. PubMed ID: 15355139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verbal fluency output in children aged 7-16 as a function of the production criterion: qualitative analysis of clustering, switching processes, and semantic network exploitation.
    Sauzéon H; Lestage P; Raboutet C; N'Kaoua B; Claverie B
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 15010250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable.
    Jones DM; Hughes RW; Macken WJ
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):201-9. PubMed ID: 20871174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of noise and gender on children's episodic and semantic memory.
    Boman E
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 15535809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.