These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20872573)

  • 1. Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs.
    Unnanuntana A; Toogood P; Hart D; Cooperman D; Grant RE
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1399-404. PubMed ID: 20872573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evaluation of two references for restoring proximal femoral anatomy during total hip arthroplasty.
    Unnanuntana A; Toogood P; Hart D; Cooperman D; Grant RE
    Clin Anat; 2010 Apr; 23(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 20069639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Restoration of femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty].
    Shi ZC; Li ZR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 42(16):997-1000. PubMed ID: 15363238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of triple pelvic osteotomy on the proximal femoral geometry in dysplastic dogs.
    Sarierler M; Yildirim IG; Ocal MK
    Res Vet Sci; 2012 Feb; 92(1):142-6. PubMed ID: 21176929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Femoral Head Center Shifts in a Mediocaudal Direction During Aging.
    Boymans TAEJ; Veldman HD; Noble PC; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):581-586. PubMed ID: 27546472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphometric evaluation of proximal femur in patients with unilateral total hip prosthesis.
    Iyem C; Güvençer M; Karatosun V; Unver B
    Clin Anat; 2014 Apr; 27(3):478-88. PubMed ID: 23650122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of femur length from markers of its proximal end.
    Prasad R; Vettivel S; Jeyaseelan L; Isaac B; Chandi G
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 8838277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between femoral head size and distance to lesser trochanter.
    Sproul RC; Reynolds HM; Lotz JC; Ries MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Aug; 461():122-4. PubMed ID: 17414164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results.
    Hartzband MA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 15062697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Age-related force distribution at the proximal end of the femur in normally growing children].
    Heimkes B; Posel P; Plitz W; Zimmer M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9199067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs.
    Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Yue B; Rubash HE; Kwon YM; Li G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 102(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26867707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
    Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
    Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck.
    Isaac B; Vettivel S; Prasad R; Jeyaseelan L; Chandi G
    Clin Anat; 1997; 10(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9283729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transverse plane evaluation of the effects of surgical technique on stem positioning and geometry of reconstruction in canine total hip replacement.
    Schulz KS; Vasseur PB; Stover SM; Kass PH
    Am J Vet Res; 1998 Aug; 59(8):1071-9. PubMed ID: 9706215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Surface-replacement total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of the femoral head osteonecrosis].
    Yu Z; Wang LM; Gui JC; Wu JX; Jiang CZ; Xu Y
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Jan; 21(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 19102270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The methods of shorting of proximal femoral and total hip arthroplasty for old femoral neck fracture with severe hip joint dislocation].
    Zha ZG; Liu N; Dong X; Yao P; Lin HS; Wang GP; Wang Z; Wu H; Huang YX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 42(23):1416-8. PubMed ID: 15733452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
    Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Sakai T; Ochi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 10379982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.