These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20873935)

  • 1. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.
    Linnell KJ; Caparos S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1643-8. PubMed ID: 21767051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.
    Remington A; Swettenham J; Campbell R; Coleman M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1388-93. PubMed ID: 19843262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trait anxiety focuses spatial attention.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    Emotion; 2012 Feb; 12(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 22148993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.
    Tsal Y; Benoni H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients.
    Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Umiltà C; Stablum F; Tebaldi F; Cantagallo A
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 20846773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
    Chao HF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 22872549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention.
    Pan Y; Soto D
    Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(15):1437-44. PubMed ID: 19883679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.