227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20873940)
1. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symbolic control of attention: tracking its temporal dynamics.
Hommel B; Akyürek EG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 19304627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
Kasten R; Navon D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
Pratt J; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurobehavioral correlates of the rapid formation of the symbolic control of visuospatial attention.
Trujillo LT; Schnyer DM
Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21446995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory.
Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring effects of voluntary attention: a comparison among predictive arrow, colour, and number cues.
Olk B; Tsankova E; Petca AR; Wilhelm AF
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2025-41. PubMed ID: 24697668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
