227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20873940)
21. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory.
Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):620-31. PubMed ID: 19304651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
Burnham BR; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is top-down about contingent capture?
Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Parallel, independent attentional control settings for colors and shapes.
Adamo M; Wozny S; Pratt J; Ferber S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1730-5. PubMed ID: 20952772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
Mayer AR; Kosson DS
Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attention to arrows: pointing to a new direction.
Ristic J; Kingstone A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1921-30. PubMed ID: 16987781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
Anderson BA; Folk CL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nonattentional effects of nonpredictive central cues.
Ivanoff J; Saoud W
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 19429965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
Griffin IC; Nobre AC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.
Hietanen JK; Nummenmaa L; Nyman MJ; Parkkola R; Hämäläinen H
Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):406-13. PubMed ID: 16949306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
Moore KS; Weissman DH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
Thiel CM; Fink GR
Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search.
Lleras A; Enns JT
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
