These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors. Ansorge U; Becker SI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 22016048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities. Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Visual search and contextual cueing: differential effects in 10-year-old children and adults. Couperus JW; Hunt RH; Nelson CA; Thomas KM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):334-48. PubMed ID: 21264739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Ansorge U; Heumann M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues. Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A demonstration of direct access to colored stimuli following cueing by color. Navon D; Kasten R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21621179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Sequence effects of the involuntary and the voluntary components of symbolic cueing. Qian Q; Wang F; Song M; Feng Y; Shinomori K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):662-668. PubMed ID: 29280048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Which way is which? Examining symbolic control of attention with compound arrow cues. Mills M; Dodd MD Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2152-63. PubMed ID: 27250360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Zellin M; Conci M; von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2065-76. PubMed ID: 21755420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience. Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors. Schmidt F; Schmidt T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously? Ghorashi S; Spalek TM; Enns JT; Di Lollo V Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19633339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. How does target duration affect object substitution masking? Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]