118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20875914)
1. New FIGO staging system of vulvar cancer indeed provides a better reflection of prognosis.
van der Steen S; de Nieuwenhof HP; Massuger L; Bulten J; de Hullu JA
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Dec; 119(3):520-5. PubMed ID: 20875914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the new FIGO staging system (2009) for vulvar cancer in the Chinese population.
Li J; Cai Y; Ke G; Xiang L; Wang L; Yang W; Wu X; Yang H
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 25759305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system.
Baiocchi G; Silva Cestari FM; Rocha RM; Lavorato-Rocha A; Maia BM; Cestari LA; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Fukazawa EM; Badiglian-Filho L; Sant'ana Rodrigues I; Soares FA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):780-5. PubMed ID: 23518307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging for vulvar cancer.
Hacker NF; Barlow EL
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 25842047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A suggested modification to FIGO stage III vulvar cancer.
Rouzier R; Preti M; Sideri M; Paniel BJ; Jones RW
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 18436291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic role of inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar squamous carcinoma: younger and older patients should be equally treated. A prospective study and literature review.
Panici PB; Tomao F; Domenici L; Giannini A; Giannarelli D; Palaia I; Di Donato V; Musella A; Angioli R; Muzii L
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 25887098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of clinical versus surgical staging systems in vulvar cancer.
Shanbour KA; Mannel RS; Morris PC; Yadack A; Walker JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):927-30. PubMed ID: 1448261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effectiveness of radical therapy in vulvar carcinoma. An analysis of 148 cases].
Bokhman JV; Maximov SJ; Ebert AD
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9206922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of staging systems for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Hopkins MP; Reid GC; Johnston CM; Morley GW
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Oct; 47(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 1427397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of recurrence and disease-free survival in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Lataifeh I; Nascimento MC; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Crandon AJ; Obermair A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):701-5. PubMed ID: 15581985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Prognostic factors for local recurrence after primary en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection.
Fonseca-Moutinho JA; Coelho MC; Silva DP
J Reprod Med; 2000 Aug; 45(8):672-8. PubMed ID: 10986688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic impact of reduced tumor-free margin distance on long-term survival in FIGO stage IB/II vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.
Micheletti L; Preti M; Cintolesi V; Corvetto E; Privitera S; Palmese E; Benedetto C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 29(5):e61. PubMed ID: 30022627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of prognostic indicators in squamous carcinoma of the vulva including nuclear DNA content.
Ballouk F; Ambros RA; Malfetano JH; Ross JS
Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 8346186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic role of FIGO stage in patients with vulvar cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Shan G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 Jun; 32(6):1121-30. PubMed ID: 26959073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The comparative study of former and latest FIGO staging of vulva cancer.
Sun X; Zhang Y; Sun J; Feng S; Yan M; Cheng H
Minerva Chir; 2012 Apr; 67(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22487921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Old versus new FIGO staging systems in predicting overall survival in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a study of 86 cases.
Lim D; Wang WL; Lee CH; Dodge T; Gilks B; Oliva E
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 23153591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occult lymph node metastases in early stage vulvar carcinoma patients.
Knopp S; Holm R; Tropé C; Nesland JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):383-7. PubMed ID: 16051338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Letter to the Editor referring to the manuscript entitled: "New FIGO staging system of vulvar cancer indeed provides a better reflection of prognosis" recently reported by van der Steen S. et al., (Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:520-5. Epub 2010 Sep 28).
Sznurkowski JJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 May; 121(2):424-5; author reply 423-4. PubMed ID: 21215438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical staging of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Analysis of treatment and survival.
Origoni M; Dindelli M; Ferrari D; Frigerio L; Rossi M; Ferrari A
Int Surg; 1996; 81(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 8803710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
