164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20876389)
1. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging.
Reeves MJ; Brandreth M; Whitby EH; Hart AR; Paley MN; Griffiths PD; Stevens JC
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 20876389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety of MR Imaging at 1.5 T in Fetuses: A Retrospective Case-Control Study of Birth Weights and the Effects of Acoustic Noise.
Strizek B; Jani JC; Mucyo E; De Keyzer F; Pauwels I; Ziane S; Mansbach AL; Deltenre P; Cos T; Cannie MM
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 25575119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Vohr BR; Folsom RC; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Fletcher KA
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):425-42. PubMed ID: 11059702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extremely low birth weight infants are at high risk for auditory neuropathy.
Xoinis K; Weirather Y; Mavoori H; Shaha SH; Iwamoto LM
J Perinatol; 2007 Nov; 27(11):718-23. PubMed ID: 17703185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.
Tasci Y; Muderris II; Erkaya S; Altinbas S; Yucel H; Haberal A
Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20015280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing loss assessed by universal newborn hearing screening--the new approach.
Prpić I; Mahulja-Stamenković V; Bilić I; Haller H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1757-61. PubMed ID: 17825432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
Liu Z; Bu X; Xing G; Lu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does 3-T fetal MRI induce adverse acoustic effects in the neonate? A preliminary study comparing postnatal auditory test performance of fetuses scanned at 1.5 and 3 T.
Jaimes C; Delgado J; Cunnane MB; Hedrick HL; Adzick NS; Gee MS; Victoria T
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Jan; 49(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30298210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.
van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH;
Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of acquisition parameters on the measurement of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates in a hospital environment.
Welch D; Greville KA; Thorne PR; Purdy SC
Audiology; 1996; 35(3):143-57. PubMed ID: 8864256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-risk neonatal hearing screening program using automated screening device performed by trained nursing personnel at Siriraj Hospital: yield and feasibility.
Srisuparp P; Gleebbur R; Ngerncham S; Chonpracha J; Singkampong J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 8():S176-82. PubMed ID: 16856439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Otoacoustic emission screen results in critically ill neonates who received gentamicin in the first week of life.
Cooper AC; Commers AR; Finkelstein M; Lipnik PG; Tollefson LM; Wilcox RA; Hoff DS
Pharmacotherapy; 2011 Jul; 31(7):649-57. PubMed ID: 21923451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Newborn hearing screening using the evoked otoacoustic emission: The Philippine General Hospital experience.
Quintos MR; Isleta PF; Chiong CC; Abes GT
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():231-3. PubMed ID: 15906743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
