BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20876425)

  • 1. Value of early referral to fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer.
    Lee S; Ozkavukcu S; Heytens E; Moy F; Oktay K
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4683-6. PubMed ID: 20876425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy.
    Danis RB; Pereira N; Elias RT
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 18(8):609-613. PubMed ID: 28786354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocols for emergency fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer-a prospective nationwide Swedish multicenter study.
    Marklund A; Eloranta S; Wikander I; Kitlinski ML; Lood M; Nedstrand E; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Zhang P; Bergh J; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):929-938. PubMed ID: 32313940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation appears unlikely to delay initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Letourneau JM; Sinha N; Wald K; Harris E; Quinn M; Imbar T; Mok-Lin E; Chien AJ; Rosen M
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2123-2129. PubMed ID: 28938748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro maturation improves oocyte or embryo cryopreservation outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.
    Oktay K; Buyuk E; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Sahin G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 May; 20(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 20219430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fertility preservation among young breast cancer patients: A single-center experience in China.
    Wan Q; Han L; Liu J; Li H; Li Y; Long QM; Tan L; Li JJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 60(5):827-830. PubMed ID: 34507656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes of fertility preservation procedures in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: a retrospective study from a single-tertiary-IVF centre.
    Sahin G; Goker ENT; Gokmen E; Yeniay L; Acet F; Zekioglu O; Tavmergen E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):518-523. PubMed ID: 34382483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
    Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer.
    Dunn L; Fox KR
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 19125006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN YOUNG WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER.
    Vuković P; Kasum M; Raguž J; Lonjak N; Bilić Knežević S; Orešković I; Beketić Orešković L; Čehić E
    Acta Clin Croat; 2019 Mar; 58(1):147-156. PubMed ID: 31363337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fertility preservation options in breast cancer patients.
    Kasum M; von Wolff M; Franulić D; Čehić E; Klepac-Pulanić T; Orešković S; Juras J
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015; 31(11):846-51. PubMed ID: 26370157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
    Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similar in vitro maturation rates of oocytes retrieved during the follicular or luteal phase offer flexible options for urgent fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
    Grynberg M; Poulain M; le Parco S; Sifer C; Fanchin R; Frydman N
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 26759139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: a prospective controlled comparison of ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen and letrozole for embryo cryopreservation.
    Oktay K; Buyuk E; Libertella N; Akar M; Rosenwaks Z
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4347-53. PubMed ID: 15824416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
    Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of fertility preservation procedures in a cohort of female patients with cancer.
    Jenninga E; Louwe LA; Peters AA; Nortier JW; Hilders CG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Feb; 160(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 22137982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing of breast cancer treatments with oocyte retrieval and embryo cryopreservation.
    Baynosa J; Westphal LM; Madrigrano A; Wapnir I
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 19854400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary results of a counselling programme for fertility preservation in female cancer patients: The experience of the GEMME DORMIENTI network.
    Ciccarone M; Hohaus S; Pulsoni A; Cavaceppi P; Franzò S; Fabbri R; Cudillo L; Battistini R; Di Rocco A; Annibali O; Cox MC; Provenzano I; Abruzzese E; Renzi D; Tesei C; Anticoli Borza P; Cuccaro A; Andriani A; D'Elia GM; Facchiano A; Marchetti P; Cantonetti M
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2020 Jan; 29(1):e13174. PubMed ID: 31571303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients' choices.
    Kappy M; Lieman HJ; Pollack S; Buyuk E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jun; 303(6):1617-1623. PubMed ID: 33544203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.
    Sonigo C; Comtet M; Duros S; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Grynberg M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jan; 35(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 28986734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.