199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20877560)
1. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory selectivity for acoustic features that confer species recognition in the tungara frog.
Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
J Exp Biol; 2011 Sep; 214(Pt 17):2911-8. PubMed ID: 21832134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of estradiol on neural responses to social signals in female túngara frogs.
Chakraborty M; Burmeister SS
J Exp Biol; 2015 Nov; 218(Pt 22):3671-7. PubMed ID: 26449971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?
Jones PL; Farris HE; Ryan MJ; Page RA
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Apr; 199(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 23322446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arginine vasotocin affects vocal behavior but not selective responses to conspecific calls in male túngara frogs.
Kime NM; Goutte S; Ryan MJ
Horm Behav; 2021 Feb; 128():104891. PubMed ID: 33197465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Female Preferences for More Elaborate Signals Are an Emergent Outcome of Male Chorusing Interactions in Túngara Frogs.
Larter LC; Ryan MJ
Am Nat; 2024 Jan; 203(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 38207138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female preferences for temporal order of call components in the túngara frog: a Bayesian analysis.
Wilczynski W; Rand SA; Ryan MJ
Anim Behav; 1999 Oct; 58(4):841-851. PubMed ID: 10512658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?
Ryan MJ; Rand AS
Anim Behav; 1998 Dec; 56(6):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 9933549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.
Farris HE; Ryan MJ
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Mar; 203(3):175-182. PubMed ID: 28197725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.
Akre KL; Ryan MJ
Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.
Burmeister SS
Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 29048536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceived Synchrony of Frog Multimodal Signal Components Is Influenced by Content and Order.
Taylor RC; Page RA; Klein BA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):902-909. PubMed ID: 28582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.
Hoke KL; Burmeister SS; Fernald RD; Rand AS; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 24(50):11264-72. PubMed ID: 15601932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.
Wilczynski W; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 11910171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.
Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Dec; 191(12):1173-83. PubMed ID: 16088388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
