269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20878901)
1. Keratin-hydroxyapatite composites: biocompatibility, osseointegration, and physical properties in an ovine model.
Dias GJ; Mahoney P; Swain M; Kelly RJ; Smith RA; Ali MA
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(4):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20878901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biocompatibility and osseointegration of reconstituted keratin in an ovine model.
Dias GJ; Peplow PV; McLaughlin A; Teixeira F; Kelly RJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Feb; 92(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 19213058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo osseointergration properties of compression-molded HDPE-HA-Al2O3 hybrid biocomposites.
Tripathi G; Gough JE; Dinda A; Basu B
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Jun; 101(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 23065866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experimental study of the biocompatible and osteoinductive behavior of the hydroxyapatite/ultra-high molecular weight polyethtlene composite].
Li DM; Zhang SZ; Chen T; Zhang Y; Song WX; Min Y; Qin Y
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 20(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 15449615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydroxyapatite-based composite for dental implants: an in vivo removal torque experiment.
Kong YM; Kim DH; Kim HE; Heo SJ; Koak JY
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):714-21. PubMed ID: 12418015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel porous bioceramics scaffold by accumulating hydroxyapatite spherules for large bone tissue engineering in vivo. I. Preparation and characterization of scaffold.
Peng Q; Jiang F; Huang P; Zhou S; Weng J; Bao C; Zhang C; Yu H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(3):920-9. PubMed ID: 19708076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes.
Habibovic P; Kruyt MC; Juhl MV; Clyens S; Martinetti R; Dolcini L; Theilgaard N; van Blitterswijk CA
J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1363-70. PubMed ID: 18404698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving mechanical and biological properties of macroporous HA scaffolds through composite coatings.
Zhao J; Lu X; Duan K; Guo LY; Zhou SB; Weng J
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2009 Nov; 74(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 19679453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo comparison of the osseointegration of vacuum plasma sprayed titanium- and hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Aebli N; Krebs J; Stich H; Schawalder P; Walton M; Schwenke D; Gruner H; Gasser B; Theis JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Aug; 66(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12889006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between the in vitro and in vivo bioactivity of the Ti/HA composites fabricated by a powder metallurgy method.
Ning C; Zhou Y
Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1944-52. PubMed ID: 18502711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological assessment of the bone-screw interface after insertion of uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated pedicular screws in the osteopenic sheep.
Fini M; Giavaresi G; Greggi T; Martini L; Aldini NN; Parisini P; Giardino R
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jul; 66(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 12833444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of microporosity on osteoinduction of calcium phosphate bone graft substitute biomaterials.
Chan O; Coathup MJ; Nesbitt A; Ho CY; Hing KA; Buckland T; Campion C; Blunn GW
Acta Biomater; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2788-94. PubMed ID: 22475784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of strontium and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite electrochemical coatings on bone ingrowth and osseointegration of selective laser sintered porous metal implants.
Mumith A; Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227232. PubMed ID: 31923253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo study on biocompatibility and bonding strength of hydroxyapatite-20vol%Ti composite with bone tissues in the rabbit.
Chu CL; Xue XY; Zhu JC; Yin ZD
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 16518019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The structure of the bond between bone and porous silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite bioceramic implants.
Porter AE; Buckland T; Hing K; Best SM; Bonfield W
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jul; 78(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 16596583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydroxyapatite particles maintain peri-implant bone mantle during osseointegration in osteoporotic bone.
Tami AE; Leitner MM; Baucke MG; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Müller R; Ito K
Bone; 2009 Dec; 45(6):1117-24. PubMed ID: 19679208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization and canine bone tissue reaction of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium using thermal decomposition method.
Hasegawa S
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1996 Mar; 43(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 8625434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
