361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20878970)
1. Combined DCE-MRI and single-voxel 2D MRS for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Lipnick S; Liu X; Sayre J; Bassett LW; Debruhl N; Thomas MA
NMR Biomed; 2010 Oct; 23(8):922-30. PubMed ID: 20878970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of choline and pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer measured by MR spectroscopic imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Su MY; Baik HM; Yu HJ; Chen JH; Mehta RS; Nalcioglu O
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 16866570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application value of 3T ¹H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing breast tumors.
Vassiou K; Tsougos I; Kousi E; Vlychou M; Athanasiou E; Theodorou K; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 23436823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI.
Suppiah S; Rahmat K; Mohd-Shah MN; Azlan CA; Tan LK; Aziz YF; Vijayananthan A; Wui AL; Yip CH
Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):e502-10. PubMed ID: 23706826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary study of 3T 1H MR spectroscopy in bone and soft tissue tumors.
Qi ZH; Li CF; Li ZF; Zhang K; Wang Q; Yu DX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jan; 122(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19187615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Investigation of Single Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement MR Imaging in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions in a Sample of Iranian Women.
Faeghi F; Baniasadipour B; Jalalshokouhi J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8335-8. PubMed ID: 26745081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric breast MRI with 3T: Effectivity of combination of contrast enhanced MRI, DWI and 1H single voxel spectroscopy in differentiation of Breast tumors.
Aribal E; Asadov R; Ramazan A; Ugurlu MÜ; Kaya H
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):979-86. PubMed ID: 27130059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinally monitoring chemotherapy effect of malignant musculoskeletal tumors with in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an initial experience.
Hsieh TJ; Li CW; Chuang HY; Liu GC; Wang CK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 19204465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined dynamic contrast enhanced breast MR and proton spectroscopic imaging: a feasibility study.
Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Argani P; Ouwerkerk R; Bhujwalla ZM; Bluemke DA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jan; 21(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15611934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast/Noise ratio on conventional MRI and choline/creatine ratio on proton MRI spectroscopy accurately discriminate low-grade from high-grade cerebral gliomas.
Fayed N; Morales H; Modrego PJ; Pina MA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):728-37. PubMed ID: 16679275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of MRS in the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue and bone tumors.
Doganay S; Altinok T; Alkan A; Kahraman B; Karakas HM
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e33-7. PubMed ID: 21376496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malignancy assessment of brain tumours with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Fayed N; Dávila J; Medrano J; Olmos S
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 18442889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: an update.
Tse GM; Yeung DK; King AD; Cheung HS; Yang WT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 104(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 17051424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the distinction of high-grade cerebral gliomas from single metastatic brain tumors.
Server A; Josefsen R; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Schellhorn T; Gadmar Ø; Kumar T; Haakonsen M; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 20092374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of large focal hepatic lesions and metabolite change of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using 3.0-T MR scanner.
Kuo YT; Li CW; Chen CY; Jao J; Wu DK; Liu GC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 May; 19(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 15112309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of gynaecological tumours at 3.0 Tesla.
Booth SJ; Pickles MD; Turnbull LW
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):300-3. PubMed ID: 19076962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
