These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2087959)

  • 1. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ.
    Rabbitt P
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 476():167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 2087959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA; Daneman M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):593-608. PubMed ID: 7860836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech.
    McCoy SL; Tun PA; Cox LC; Colangelo M; Stewart RA; Wingfield A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jan; 58(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15881289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimodal stimulus presentation and expanded auditory bandwidth improve older adults' speech perception.
    Brault LM; Gilbert JL; Lansing CR; McCarley JS; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2010 Aug; 52(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 21141241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models.
    Piquado T; Cousins KA; Wingfield A; Miller P
    Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 1365():48-65. PubMed ID: 20875801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Presentation Mode and Production Type on Word Memory for Hearing Impaired Signers.
    Swead RT; Mama Y; Icht M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):875-884. PubMed ID: 30479260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive performance of young and elderly subjects on the free word recall memory test: effect of presentation order on recall order.
    Santos-Galduróz RF; Oliveira FG; Galduróz JC; Bueno OF
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2009 Oct; 42(10):988-92. PubMed ID: 19784482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hygge S; Kjellberg A; Nöstl A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1390. PubMed ID: 26441765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of input condition on free recall in young and old adults.
    Arenberg D
    J Gerontol; 1976 Sep; 31(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 59747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.