These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20879962)
1. Quality of glucose measurement with blood glucose meters at the point-of-care: relevance of interfering factors. Heinemann L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):847-57. PubMed ID: 20879962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cook and Chill: Effect of Temperature on the Performance of Nonequilibrated Blood Glucose Meters. Deakin S; Steele D; Clarke S; Gribben C; Bexley AM; Laan R; Kerr D J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 9(6):1260-9. PubMed ID: 26292960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips. Bamberg R; Schulman K; MacKenzie M; Moore J; Olchesky S Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 16315736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of partial pressure of oxygen in blood samples on measurement performance in glucose-oxidase-based systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1513-21. PubMed ID: 24351177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interference studies with two hospital-grade and two home-grade glucose meters. Lyon ME; Baskin LB; Braakman S; Presti S; Dubois J; Shirey T Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Oct; 11(10):641-7. PubMed ID: 19821756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a new interference-resistant glucose meter. Vanavanan S; Santanirand P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Chittamma A; Dubois JA; Shirey T; Heinz M Clin Biochem; 2010 Jan; 43(1-2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19769953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use. Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hematocrit compensation in electrochemical blood glucose monitoring systems. Teodorczyk M; Cardosi M; Setford S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 22768896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of blood glucose meters in biotechnological applications. FitzGerald J; Vermerris W Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2005 Jun; 41(Pt 3):233-9. PubMed ID: 15367104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the reference method isotope dilution gas chromatography mass spectrometry (ID/GC/MS) to establish metrological traceability for calibration and control of blood glucose test systems. Andreis E; Küllmer K; Appel M J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 24876614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glucose meter inaccuracy and the impact on the care of patients. Hellman R Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2012 Mar; 28(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 22215509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of total analytical error in consumer and hospital glucose meters contributed by hematocrit, maltose, and ascorbate. Lyon ME; DuBois JA; Fick GH; Lyon AW J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 4(6):1479-94. PubMed ID: 21129345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ambient temperature on analytical performance of self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Nerhus K; Rustad P; Sandberg S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Sep; 13(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 21714677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) based and glucose oxidase (GOX) based blood glucose meter systems at moderately high altitude. Bilen H; Kilicaslan A; Akcay G; Albayrak F J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17365439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a novel test strip technology for blood glucose monitoring: accuracy at hypoglycaemic glucose levels. Bellary S; Cameron H; Macleod K; Malecha M; Koria K; Raja P; Cabezudo JD; Ellison J Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 98(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 23063304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maltose interference-free test strips for blood glucose testing at point-of-care: a laboratory performance evaluation. Ng WY; Tiong CC; Jacob E Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 20879959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new blood glucose monitoring system with auto-calibration for home and hospital bedside use. Kilo C; Dickey WT; Joynes JO; Pinson MB; Baum JM; Parkes JL; Parker DR Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 74(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 16644056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of glucose dehydrogenase-and glucose oxidase-based blood glucose meters at high altitude and low temperature. Oberg D; Ostenson CG Diabetes Care; 2005 May; 28(5):1261. PubMed ID: 15855608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]