BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20880140)

  • 1. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate fixation and kerf cut cylinder fixation for ventral arthrodesis of the fourth and the fifth equine cervical vertebrae.
    Reardon RJ; Bailey R; Walmsley JP; Heller J; Lischer C
    Vet Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(8):980-90. PubMed ID: 20880140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot in vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and kerf-cut cylinder fixation for ventral fusion of fourth and fifth equine cervical vertebrae.
    Reardon R; Bailey R; Walmsley J; Heller J; Lischer C
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(5):371-9. PubMed ID: 19718487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a 4.5 mm narrow locking compression plate construct versus a 4.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate construct for arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint.
    Ahern BJ; Showalter BL; Elliott DM; Richardson DW; Getman LM
    Vet Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 23445267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus Positive Profile Pins and Polymethylmethacrylate for Stabilization of the Canine Lumbar Vertebrae.
    Sturges BK; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Anwer C; Fukuda S; Hitchens PL; Wisner T; Hayashi K; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 27007649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intervertebral biomechanics of locking compression plate monocortical fixation of the canine cervical spine.
    Agnello KA; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Hayashi K; Welihozkiy AT; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21133955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mechanical comparison of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: an axial locking compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws versus an axial dynamic compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws.
    Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF; Martin GS
    Vet Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 21521241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5-hole 4.5 mm locking compression plate and 5-hole 4.5 mm dynamic compression plate for equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis.
    Seo JP; Yamaga T; Tsuzuki N; Yamada K; Haneda S; Furuoka H; Sasaki N
    Vet Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 24512440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of two 7-hole 3.5-mm broad and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates.
    Watt BC; Edwards RB; Markel MD; McCabe R; Wilson DG
    Vet Surg; 2002; 31(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 11778172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Veterinary Locking Plates to Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation in Canine Cadaveric Cervical Vertebral Column.
    Hettlich BF; Fosgate GT; Litsky AS
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27902850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation with a 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
    Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF; Martin GS; Gill MS
    Vet Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(7):833-8. PubMed ID: 20459499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of Ventral Fusion of Two or Three Cervical Vertebrae with a Locking Compression Plate for the Treatment of Cervical Stenotic Myelopathy in Eight Horses.
    Kühnle C; Fürst AE; Ranninger E; Suárez Sánchez-Andrade J; Kümmerle JM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Sep; 31(5):356-363. PubMed ID: 30138950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of an interlocking nail system and dynamic compression plate fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones.
    Lopez MJ; Wilson DG; Vanderby R; Markel MD
    Vet Surg; 1999; 28(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 10493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model.
    Malenfant RC; Sod GA
    Vet Surg; 2014 May; 43(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24720361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical testing of 3.5 mm locking and non-locking bone plates.
    DeTora M; Kraus K
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 18704237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
    Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro biomechanical comparison of multistrand cables with conventional cervical stabilization.
    Weis JC; Cunningham BW; Kanayama M; Parker L; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(18):2108-14. PubMed ID: 8893435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures.
    Monck SL; McGilvray KC; Easley JT
    Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 32294301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.