240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20880140)
41. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of three 4.5-mm and two 5.5-mm cortical screws.
Watt BC; Edwards RB; Markel MD; McCabe R; Wilson DG
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11340561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel total cervical prosthesis in a single-level cervical subtotal corpectomy model: an in vitro human cadaveric study.
Wu ZX; Han BJ; Zhao X; Kong L; Liu D; Cui G; Lei W
J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21492873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model.
Beierer LH; Glyde M; Day RE; Hosgood GL
Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 25132257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture.
Xu GH; Liu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chen W; Liu YJ; Peng AQ; Zhang YZ
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 33(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 23592139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs.
Hicks DG; Pitts MJ; Bagley RS; Vasavada A; Chen AV; Wininger FA; Simon JC
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jun; 70(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19496660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy.
Grubb MR; Currier BL; Stone J; Warden KE; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep; 22(17):1948-54. PubMed ID: 9306522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Dmitriev AE; Cunningham BW; Hu N; Sell G; Vigna F; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 15897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparative biomechanical study of a novel integrated plate spacer for stabilization of cervical spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Majid K; Chinthakunta S; Muzumdar A; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 22244511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration.
Mageswaran P; McLain RF; Colbrunn R; Bonner T; Hothem E; Bartsch A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun; 18(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23600582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparative biomechanical study of traditional and in-line plating systems following immediate stabilization of single and bi-level cervical segments.
Hunter W; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Hussain M; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21824696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model.
Pearson T; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day R
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 25633043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of a 3-hole 4.5-mm Dynamic Compression Plate and a 7-hole 5.5-mm Y Locking Compression Plate for Arthrodesis of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint in Horses-an Ex Vivo Biomechanical Study.
Latorre CAS; de Souza AF; Ramos PAR; Nóbrega FS; van de Graaf GMM; Pereira CAM; Ferrigno CRA; Hendrickson DA; De Zoppa ALDV
J Equine Vet Sci; 2020 Nov; 94():103252. PubMed ID: 33077103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dual Bone Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Implant Constructs in a Mid-Diaphyseal Fracture Model of the Feline Radius and Ulna.
Preston TJ; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day RE
Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 27007749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biomechanical assessment of the effects of vertebral distraction-fusion techniques on the adjacent segment of canine cervical vertebrae.
Hakozaki T; Ichinohe T; Kanno N; Yogo T; Harada Y; Inaba T; Kasai Y; Hara Y
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Nov; 77(11):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 27805449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
