These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64. An In Vitro Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cervical Extension Plates for Stabilizing Degenerated Adjacent Levels. Majid K; Moldavsky M; Khalil S; Gudipally M Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Feb; 30(1):E44-E48. PubMed ID: 28107242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Anterior C2-C3 fixation with screws: proposal of a new technique and comparative mechanical assays. Defino HL; Néri OJ; Shimano AC Eur Spine J; 2006 Jul; 15(7):1159-64. PubMed ID: 16841224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation. Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for ankle arthrodesis. Clifford C; Berg S; McCann K; Hutchinson B J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 25116232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture. Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion. Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy. Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model. Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Biomechanical testing of a hybrid locking plate fixation of equine sesamoid osteotomies. Almeida da Silveira E; Levasseur A; Lacourt M; Elce Y; Petit Y Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 24441589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization. Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Minimally invasive proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using a locking compression plate and tissue engineering in horses: a pilot study. Seo JP; Yamaga T; Tsuzuki N; Yamada K; Haneda S; Furuoka H; Tabata Y; Sasaki N Can Vet J; 2014 Nov; 55(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 25392547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison of limited-contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate constructs for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in the horse. Rocconi RA; Carmalt JL; Sampson SN; Elder SH; Gilbert EE Can Vet J; 2015 Jun; 56(6):615-9. PubMed ID: 26028685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]