BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20880261)

  • 1. Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses.
    Näätänen R; Kujala T; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):4-22. PubMed ID: 20880261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.
    Näätänen R; Paavilainen P; Rinne T; Alho K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2544-90. PubMed ID: 17931964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-attentive spectro-temporal feature processing in the human auditory system.
    Zaehle T; Jancke L; Herrmann CS; Meyer M
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep; 22(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 19266276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming.
    Rahne T; Deike S; Selezneva E; Brosch M; König R; Scheich H; Böckmann M; Brechmann A
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():118-31. PubMed ID: 17765207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings.
    Alho K; Winkler I; Escera C; Huotilainen M; Virtanen J; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Mar; 35(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 9529947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
    Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential to violations of abstract regularities: a review.
    Paavilainen P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 May; 88(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 23542165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event.
    Hughes HC; Darcey TM; Barkan HI; Williamson PD; Roberts DW; Aslin CH
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1073-89. PubMed ID: 11352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of the length of the temporal window of integration for rapidly presented auditory information as indexed by MMN.
    Wang W; Datta H; Sussman E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1695-706. PubMed ID: 15905124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception.
    Dehaene-Lambertz G; Pallier C; Serniclaes W; Sprenger-Charolles L; Jobert A; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15588593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects.
    Winkler I; Denham SL; Nelken I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):532-40. PubMed ID: 19828357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inadequate inhibition of redundant auditory inputs in Alzheimer's disease: an MEG study.
    Cheng CH; Wang PN; Hsu WY; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 22155475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of healthy aging on auditory processing in humans as indexed by transient brain responses.
    Matilainen LE; Talvitie SS; Pekkonen E; Alku P; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 121(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 20359943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
    Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.