162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20881366)
1. Comparison of different sonographic methods to determine fetal abdominal circumference.
Kehl S; Zaiss I; Freiburg F; Speierer A; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 28(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 20881366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
Schmidt U; Temerinac D; Bildstein K; Tuschy B; Mayer J; Sütterlin M; Siemer J; Kehl S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
Hoopmann M; Bernau B; Hart N; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
Kehl S; Schmidt U; Spaich S; Schild RL; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical study of Osaka formula and improved multiparameter ultrasonic measurement for fetal weight estimation].
Qiu YW; Zhong M; Chen CH; Hu ML; Chen LN; Sun XY; Su GD; Song TR; Yu YH
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Apr; 27(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 17545030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.
Hasenoehrl G; Pohlhammer A; Gruber R; Staudach A; Steiner H
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 19544232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the small fetus.
Schild RL; Maringa M; Siemer J; Meurer B; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schmid M; Hothorn T; Hansmann ME
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 18663765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
Bennini JR; Marussi EF; Barini R; Faro C; Peralta CF
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 20069666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound.
Schild RL; Fimmers R; Hansmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 11169329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Fetuses with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.
Faschingbauer F; Mayr A; Geipel A; Gembruch U; Dammer U; Raabe E; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Schild RL; Siemer J; Schmid M
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 24927106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
