These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20882209)
1. Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Wera GD; Gillespie RJ; Petty C; Petersilge WJ; Kraay MJ; Goldberg VM Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Aug; 39(8):E78-83. PubMed ID: 20882209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision. Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR. Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 17403794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years. Bjorgul K; Novicoff WN; Andersen ST; Ahlund OR; Bunes A; Wiig M; Brevig K Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 23814237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up. Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome. Witzleb WC; Arnold M; Krummenauer F; Knecht A; Ranisch H; Günther KP Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18226996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Function and survival after revision of hip resurfacing. Jaiswal A; Gilbert RE; Sunil Kumar KH; Carrothers AD; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 21960447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes. Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty. Costa CR; Johnson AJ; Naziri Q; Mont MA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 22035478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies. Marker DR; Strimbu K; McGrath MS; Zywiel MG; Mont MA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19583538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Vail TP; Mina CA; Yergler JD; Pietrobon R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():123-31. PubMed ID: 17006369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study. Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Beaulé PE; Shim P; Banga K J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 19553070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]