138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20882343)
1. Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?
Eliya F; Kernen K; Gonzalez J; Peters K; Ibrahim I; Petzel K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 20882343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical learning curve for open radical prostatectomy: Is there an end to the learning curve?
Kretschmer A; Mandel P; Buchner A; Stief CG; Tilki D
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1721-7. PubMed ID: 25791787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Stolzenburg JU; Qazi HA; Holze S; Mende M; Nicolaus M; Franz T; Ho Thi P; Dietel A; Liatsikos E; Do M
J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 22834963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: critical analysis of outcomes and learning curve.
McNeill AS; Nabi G; McLornan L; Cook J; Bollina P; Stolzenberg JU
BJU Int; 2010 Nov; 106(10):1537-43. PubMed ID: 20346047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?
Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.
Garisto J; Bertolo R; Wilson CA; Kaouk J
World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):821-828. PubMed ID: 31811370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach.
Frazier HA; Robertson JE; Paulson DF
J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):888-90. PubMed ID: 1538490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy learning curve for experienced laparoscopic surgeons: does it really exist?
Tobias-Machado M; Mitre AI; Rubinstein M; Costa EF; Hidaka AK
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 27136471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early prostate-specific antigen failure following radical perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy: the importance of seminal vesicle excision.
Theodorescu D; Lippert MC; Broder SR; Boyd JC
Urology; 1998 Feb; 51(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 9495711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation in the early phase of the learning curve comparing to retropubic approach.
Martorana G; Manferrari F; Bertaccini A; Malizia M; Palmieri F; Severini E; Vitullo G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2004 Mar; 76(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15185814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radical perineal prostatectomy].
Petrov SB; Korol' VD
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2005; 164(6):78-81. PubMed ID: 16792322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2003 Sep; 44(3):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 12932927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.
Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative morbidity of the extended radical perineal prostatectomy.
Brehmer B; Borchers H; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Biesterfeld S; Jakse G
Eur Urol; 2001 Aug; 40(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 11528190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
