These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Biaxial analysis of synthetic scaffolds for hernia repair demonstrates variability in mechanical anisotropy, non-linearity and hysteresis. Deeken CR; Thompson DM; Castile RM; Lake SP J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Oct; 38():6-16. PubMed ID: 24997427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Synthetic Surgical Meshes Used for Hernia Repair: Physiological Loads Modify Anisotropy Response. Cordero A; Hernández-Gascón B; Pascual G; Bellón JM; Calvo B; Peña E Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jul; 44(7):2181-8. PubMed ID: 26620778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of mechanical compatibility of hernia meshes and human abdominal fascia. Doneva M; Pashkouleva D Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 29457590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An approach to evaluating and benchmarking the mechanical behavior of a surgical mesh prototype designed for the repair of abdominal wall defects. García-García C; Carrascal-Morillo MT; Castell Gómez JT; Bernal Guerrero C; García Prada JC J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104909. PubMed ID: 34736025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. Orenstein SB; Saberski ER; Kreutzer DL; Novitsky YW J Surg Res; 2012 Aug; 176(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 22099590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes. Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. Melman L; Jenkins ED; Hamilton NA; Bender LC; Brodt MD; Deeken CR; Greco SC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD Hernia; 2011 Aug; 15(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 21279663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of mast cell modulation on early host response to implanted synthetic meshes. Orenstein SB; Saberski ER; Klueh U; Kreutzer DL; Novitsky YW Hernia; 2010 Oct; 14(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 20526725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE OXIDE RESTERILISATION AND IN-VITRO DEGRADATION ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PARTIALLY ABSORBABLE COMPOSITE HERNIA MESHES. Endogan T; Ozyaylali I; Kulacoglu H; Serbetci K; Kiyak G; Hasirci N East Afr Med J; 2013 Jun; 90(6):195-201. PubMed ID: 26859026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term anisotropic mechanical response of surgical meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects. Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Bellón JM; Calvo B J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):257-71. PubMed ID: 22100101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical compatibility of surgical mesh and fascia being reinforced: dependence of experimental hernia defect repair results on anisotropic surgical mesh positioning. Anurov MV; Titkova SM; Oettinger AP Hernia; 2012 Apr; 16(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 21909779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The long-term behavior of lightweight and heavyweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects is determined by the host tissue repair process provoked by the mesh. Pascual G; Hernández-Gascón B; Rodríguez M; Sotomayor S; Peña E; Calvo B; Bellón JM Surgery; 2012 Nov; 152(5):886-95. PubMed ID: 22575883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reliable and replicable test protocol for the mechanical evaluation of synthetic meshes. Civilini V; Giacalone V; Audenino AL; Terzini M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Aug; 144():105987. PubMed ID: 37413894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Sanders D; Lambie J; Bond P; Moate R; Steer JA Hernia; 2013 Dec; 17(6):779-89. PubMed ID: 23780573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Varying degrees of nonlinear mechanical behavior arising from geometric differences of urogynecological meshes. Feola A; Pal S; Moalli P; Maiti S; Abramowitch S J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2584-9. PubMed ID: 25011619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall. Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Melero H; Pascual G; Doblaré M; Ginebra MP; Bellón JM; Calvo B Acta Biomater; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3905-13. PubMed ID: 21763794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical properties of mesh materials used for hernia repair and soft tissue augmentation. Pott PP; Schwarz ML; Gundling R; Nowak K; Hohenberger P; Roessner ED PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46978. PubMed ID: 23071685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term behavior of different polymer structure lightweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects. Pascual G; Hernández-Gascón B; Sotomayor S; Peña E; Calvo B; Buján J; Bellón JM Histol Histopathol; 2013 May; 28(5):611-21. PubMed ID: 23386547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]