These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20882518)

  • 1. Performance evaluation of fault detection methods for wastewater treatment processes.
    Corominas L; Villez K; Aguado D; Rieger L; Rosén C; Vanrolleghem PA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 20882518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time fault detection and isolation in biological wastewater treatment plants.
    Baggiani F; Marsili-Libelli S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(11):2949-61. PubMed ID: 19934517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New monitoring technique with an ICA algorithm in the wastewater treatment process.
    Lee JM; Yoo CK; Lee IB
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):49-56. PubMed ID: 12926669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards a global multi objective optimization of wastewater treatment plant based on modeling and genetic algorithms.
    Béraud B; Steyer JP; Lemoine C; Latrille E; Manic G; Printemps-Vacquier C
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):109-16. PubMed ID: 18025738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: fault detection and isolation.
    Steyer JP; Genovesi A; Harmand J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):183-90. PubMed ID: 11385845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking of control strategies for ATAD technology: a first approach to the automatic control of sludge treatment systems.
    Zambrano JA; Gil-Martinez M; Garcia-Sanz M; Irizar I
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19633383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disturbance detection and isolation in the activated sludge process.
    Yoo CK; Choi SW; Lee I
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):217-26. PubMed ID: 11936637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
    Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of control strategies using an oxidation ditch benchmark.
    Abusam A; Keesman KJ; Spanjers H; van SG; Meinema K
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):151-8. PubMed ID: 11936628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensor fault diagnosis for nonlinear processes with parametric uncertainties.
    Rajaraman S; Hahn J; Mannan MS
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Mar; 130(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 16298476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning approaches for data-driven process monitoring of biological wastewater treatment plant: A review of research works on benchmark simulation model No. 1(BSM1).
    Khurshid A; Pani AK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jul; 195(8):916. PubMed ID: 37402850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fault diagnosis of the polypropylene production process (UNIPOL PP) using ANFIS.
    Lau CK; Heng YS; Hussain MA; Mohamad Nor MI
    ISA Trans; 2010 Oct; 49(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 20667537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Statistical Fault Detection Technique and Application to Biological Phenomena Modeled by S-Systems.
    Mansouri M; Nounou MN; Nounou HN
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Sep; 16(6):504-512. PubMed ID: 28708564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive multiscale principal components analysis for online monitoring of wastewater treatment.
    Lennox J; Rosen C
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):227-35. PubMed ID: 11936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing statistical process control charts for fault detection in wastewater treatment.
    Marais HL; Zaccaria V; Odlare M
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 85(4):1250-1262. PubMed ID: 35228367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling.
    Corominas LL; Rieger L; Takács I; Ekama G; Hauduc H; Vanrolleghem PA; Oehmen A; Gernaey KV; van Loosdrecht MC; Comeau Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):841-57. PubMed ID: 20182062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control?
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):127-34. PubMed ID: 11936625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.