211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20882653)
1. Early assessment of infarct size and prediction of functional recovery by quantitative myocardial blush grade in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated according to current guidelines.
Riedle N; Dickhaus H; Erbacher M; Steen H; Andrassy M; Lossnitzer D; Hardt S; Rottbauer W; Zugck C; Giannitsis E; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 20882653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HMGB1 as a predictor of infarct transmurality and functional recovery in patients with myocardial infarction.
Andrassy M; Volz HC; Riedle N; Gitsioudis G; Seidel C; Laohachewin D; Zankl AR; Kaya Z; Bierhaus A; Giannitsis E; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
J Intern Med; 2011 Sep; 270(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 21362071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative myocardial blush grade: prepped for a core lab standardization.
Hehrlein C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):511-2. PubMed ID: 20882654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted quantification of myocardial reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts functional and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Gu YL; Haeck JD; Vogelzang M; Bilodeau L; Krucoff MW; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Zijlstra F; Koch KT
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 20518003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the angiographic myocardial blush grade with delayed-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance for the assessment of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarctions.
Vicente J; Mewton N; Croisille P; Staat P; Bonnefoy-Cudraz E; Ovize M; Revel D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 74(7):1000-7. PubMed ID: 19626683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of functional recovery by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking imaging in first time ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Comparison to infarct size and transmurality by late gadolinium enhancement.
Buss SJ; Krautz B; Hofmann N; Sander Y; Rust L; Giusca S; Galuschky C; Seitz S; Giannitsis E; Pleger S; Raake P; Most P; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 183():162-70. PubMed ID: 25675901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of myocardial tissue loss by quantitative densitometric myocardial blush parameters following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Sasi V; Gavallér H; Kalapos A; Domsik P; Nagy FT; Ungi T; Ungi I; Forster T; Nemes A
Acta Physiol Hung; 2015 Jun; 102(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 26100310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac magnetic resonance derived late microvascular obstruction assessment post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is the best predictor of left ventricular function: a comparison of angiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance derived measurements.
Wong DT; Leung MC; Richardson JD; Puri R; Bertaso AG; Williams K; Meredith IT; Teo KS; Worthley MI; Worthley SG
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1971-81. PubMed ID: 22310980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of myocardial salvage during acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with a combined angiographic and CMR myocardial salvage index.
Ortiz-Pérez JT; Lee DC; Meyers SN; Davidson CJ; Bonow RO; Wu E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 May; 3(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 20466344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative role of NT-pro BNP and cardiac troponin T at 96 hours for estimation of infarct size and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction.
Steen H; Futterer S; Merten C; Jünger C; Katus HA; Giannitsis E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):749-58. PubMed ID: 17891611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac computed tomography for prediction of myocardial viability after reperfused acute myocardial infarction.
Shapiro MD; Sarwar A; Nieman K; Nasir K; Brady TJ; Cury RC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 20580906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early electrocardiographic findings and MR imaging-verified microvascular injury and myocardial infarct size.
Nijveldt R; van der Vleuten PA; Hirsch A; Beek AM; Tio RA; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ; van Rossum AC; Zijlstra F
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Oct; 2(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 19833308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blush to assess tissue level reperfusion in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: incremental prognostic value compared with visual assessment.
Korosoglou G; Haars A; Michael G; Erbacher M; Hardt S; Giannitsis E; Kurz K; Franz-Josef N; Dickhaus H; Katus HA; Kuecherer H
Am Heart J; 2007 Apr; 153(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 17383301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myocardium selective densitometric perfusion assessment after acute myocardial infarction.
Ungi T; Ungi I; Jónás Z; Sasi V; Lassó A; Zimmermann Z; Forster T; Palkó A; Nemes A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2009; 10(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 19159855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of myocardial blush grade early and late after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in predicting left ventricular function.
Hoffmann R; Haager P; Arning J; Christott P; Radke P; Blindt R; Ortlepp J; Lepper W; Hanrath P
Am J Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 92(9):1015-9. PubMed ID: 14583349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Native T1 Mapping by 3-T CMR Imaging for Characterization of Chronic Myocardial Infarctions.
Kali A; Choi EY; Sharif B; Kim YJ; Bi X; Spottiswoode B; Cokic I; Yang HJ; Tighiouart M; Conte AH; Li D; Berman DS; Choi BW; Chang HJ; Dharmakumar R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1019-1030. PubMed ID: 26298071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between myocardial reperfusion, infarct size, and mortality: the INFUSE-AMI (Intracoronary Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Anterior Myocardial Infarction) trial.
Brener SJ; Maehara A; Dizon JM; Fahy M; Witzenbichler B; Parise H; El-Omar M; Dambrink JH; Mehran R; Oldroyd K; Gibson CM; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):718-24. PubMed ID: 23866184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.
Xu J; Song YB; Hahn JY; Chang SA; Lee SC; Choe YH; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Oh JK; Gwon HC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 22072243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and applicability of computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Haeck JD; Gu YL; Vogelzang M; Bilodeau L; Krucoff MW; Tijssen JG; De Winter RJ; Zijlstra F; Koch KT
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 75(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 20091824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-sensitivity troponin T for prediction of left ventricular function and infarct size one year following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Reinstadler SJ; Feistritzer HJ; Klug G; Mair J; Tu AM; Kofler M; Henninger B; Franz WM; Metzler B
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():188-93. PubMed ID: 26397408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
