82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20882749)
1. [Safety of the patient and the Mammography Program in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: Care of cancers detected by mammography. Retrospective studies].
Wagnon MC; Scharpantgen A; Back C; Hansen-Koenig D
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2010; (2):303-13. PubMed ID: 20882749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
von Fournier D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.
Khoo LA; Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 16244252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the national epidemiological program of breast cancer screening in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, 1999-2002].
Scharpantgen A; Lux C; Wagnon MC; Shannoun F; Schank JM; Back C; Brochmann C; Hansen-Koenig D
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2004; (1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15544001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography.
Burnside ES; Park JM; Fine JP; Sisney GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Sep; 185(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 16120936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organisational aspects of mammography screening in digital settings: first experiences of Luxembourg.
Shannoun F; Schanck JM; Scharpantgen A; Wagnon MC; Ben Daoud M; Back C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 18448438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Breast cancer: generalised screening in France from now on].
Séradour B
Rev Prat; 2004 Apr; 54(8):830-6. PubMed ID: 15274453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance data of screening mammography at a dedicated breast health centre.
Apffelstaedt JP; Steenkamp V; Baatjes K
S Afr Med J; 2008 Dec; 98(12):950-3. PubMed ID: 19374072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Théberge I; Hébert-Croteau N; Langlois A; Major D; Brisson J
CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 15655240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.
Kan L; Olivotto IA; Warren Burhenne LJ; Sickles EA; Coldman AJ
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 10796940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
