These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883038)

  • 1. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Architectural repertoire of ligand-binding pockets on protein surfaces.
    Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Chembiochem; 2010 Mar; 11(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 20069621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
    Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion.
    Li B; Turuvekere S; Agrawal M; La D; Ramani K; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):670-83. PubMed ID: 17975834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H; Kryshtafovych A; Prusis P; Fidelis K; Wikberg JE; Komorowski J; Hvidsten TR
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching.
    Brakoulias A; Jackson RM
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 15211509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A searchable database for comparing protein-ligand binding sites for the analysis of structure-function relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):736-42. PubMed ID: 16563004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria.
    Peters KP; Fauck J; Frömmel C
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ligand-guided receptor optimization.
    Katritch V; Rueda M; Abagyan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():189-205. PubMed ID: 22323222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres.
    Kim D; Cho CH; Cho Y; Ryu J; Bhak J; Kim DS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Apr; 26(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 18023220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications.
    B-Rao C; Subramanian J; Sharma SD
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Apr; 14(7-8):394-400. PubMed ID: 19185058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Merging chemical and biological space: Structural mapping of enzyme binding pocket space.
    Weskamp N; Hüllermeier E; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2009 Aug; 76(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 19173307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hot-spots-guided receptor-based pharmacophores (HS-Pharm): a knowledge-based approach to identify ligand-anchoring atoms in protein cavities and prioritize structure-based pharmacophores.
    Barillari C; Marcou G; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1396-410. PubMed ID: 18570371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SH3-SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family.
    Brannetti B; Via A; Cestra G; Cesareni G; Helmer-Citterich M
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 298(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 10764600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational methodologies for compound database searching that utilize experimental protein-ligand interaction information.
    Tan L; Batista J; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 20636330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.