These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883038)

  • 21. VISCANA: visualized cluster analysis of protein-ligand interaction based on the ab initio fragment molecular orbital method for virtual ligand screening.
    Amari S; Aizawa M; Zhang J; Fukuzawa K; Mochizuki Y; Iwasawa Y; Nakata K; Chuman H; Nakano T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):221-30. PubMed ID: 16426058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
    Henrich S; Salo-Ahen OM; Huang B; Rippmann FF; Cruciani G; Wade RC
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Homology model adjustment and ligand screening with a pseudoreceptor of the human histamine H4 receptor.
    Tanrikulu Y; Proschak E; Werner T; Geppert T; Todoroff N; Klenner A; Kottke T; Sander K; Schneider E; Seifert R; Stark H; Clark T; Schneider G
    ChemMedChem; 2009 May; 4(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 19343764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comprehensive structural classification of ligand-binding motifs in proteins.
    Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
    Structure; 2009 Feb; 17(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 19217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection.
    Oda A; Yamaotsu N; Hirono S
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Dec; 30(16):2728-37. PubMed ID: 19399761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.
    Jain AN
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 14761196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consistency analysis of similarity between multiple alignments: prediction of protein function and fold structure from analysis of local sequence motifs.
    Kunin V; Chan B; Sitbon E; Lithwick G; Pietrokovski S
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):939-49. PubMed ID: 11273712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Large scale analysis of protein-binding cavities using self-organizing maps and wavelet-based surface patches to describe functional properties, selectivity discrimination, and putative cross-reactivity.
    Kupas K; Ultsch A; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1288-306. PubMed ID: 18041748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling.
    Schafferhans A; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(1):407-27. PubMed ID: 11243828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SitePrint: three-dimensional pharmacophore descriptors derived from protein binding sites for family based active site analysis, classification, and drug design.
    Arnold JR; Burdick KW; Pegg SC; Toba S; Lamb ML; Kuntz ID
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2190-8. PubMed ID: 15554689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.
    Zhong S; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2303-15. PubMed ID: 17900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using supervised fuzzy clustering to predict protein structural classes.
    Shen HB; Yang J; Liu XJ; Chou KC
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 334(2):577-81. PubMed ID: 16023077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MIAX: a new paradigm for modeling biomacromolecular interactions and complex formation in condensed phases.
    Del Carpio-Muñoz CA; Ichiishi E; Yoshimori A; Yoshikawa T
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):696-732. PubMed ID: 12211037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alignment-free ultra-high-throughput comparison of druggable protein-ligand binding sites.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 20058856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Angle-distance image matching techniques for protein structure comparison.
    Chu CH; Tang CY; Tang CY; Pai TW
    J Mol Recognit; 2008; 21(6):442-52. PubMed ID: 18729044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. BSAlign: a rapid graph-based algorithm for detecting ligand-binding sites in protein structures.
    Aung Z; Tong JC
    Genome Inform; 2008; 21():65-76. PubMed ID: 19425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets.
    Volkamer A; Griewel A; Grombacher T; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2041-52. PubMed ID: 20945875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons.
    Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Kahraman A; Thornton JM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2347-55. PubMed ID: 15728116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.