These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20883182)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Bolivar AV; Gomez SS; Merino P; Alonso-Bartolomé P; Garcia EO; Cacho PM; Hoffmeister JW
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 20883182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
    Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
    Day D
    Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications.
    Adkisson CD; Vallow LA; Kowalchik K; McNeil R; Hines S; Deperi E; Moreno A; Roy V; Perez EA; McLaughlin SA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):1678-83. PubMed ID: 21207171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists.
    Krupinski EA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 15054153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
    Angarita FA; Acuna SA; Fonseca A; Crystal P; Escallon J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():273-9. PubMed ID: 20853046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
    Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
    Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
    Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best?
    McGhan LJ; Wasif N; Gray RJ; Giurescu ME; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Ocal IT; Stucky CC; Pockaj BA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():255-62. PubMed ID: 20853043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic difficulties in infiltrating lobular breast cancer: value of ultrasonography. 33 cases].
    Escolano E; Tournegros JM; Le Marc'Hadour F; Bernard P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 9509318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology.
    Newcomer LM; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A; Storer BE; Yasui Y; Daling JR; Potter JD
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 12209738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging.
    Hulvat M; Sandalow N; Rademaker A; Helenowski I; Hansen NM
    Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):746-50; discussion 750-1. PubMed ID: 20708761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
    Rissanen TJ; Mäkäräinen HP; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Lindholm EL
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 7619612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.